Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r2  >  r1  ...
AhiranisCastilloFirstPaper 2 - 25 Apr 2024 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Deleted:
<
<
 
Deleted:
<
<
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
 

Why My Fourth Amendment Might Be Protected Even if Yours is Not

Line: 27 to 25
 Still, I believe this is a complicated question on the language of the Fourth Amendment, particularly the phrase be secure and a matter of what it means in this expansive technological era.
Added:
>
>
These 460 words are the basis of an idea, but it's true that leaving half the space unused leave much room for improvement. The Fourth Amendment says, as you don't remind the reader, that the rights named are to be secure "against unreasonable search and seizure." That's not the general security you seem to be talking about. You speak of "the phone" as a metaphorical container for data actually exfiltrated to third parties, which adds to confusion rather than clarification. You seem tacitly to assume that people must do what they do, that is, that there are no ways in which people modifying their own behavior can affect their freedom. This is odd, because in our tradition we mostly treat freedom as the outcome of individual as well as collective political choices. I certainly experience in my own technical life the impression that the amount of freedom I have depends mostly on me. If that's not true for you, why isn't it? Any or all of these would be useful ways to employ another 500 words and to improve the next draft.

 



AhiranisCastilloFirstPaper 1 - 05 Mar 2024 - Main.AhiranisCastillo
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"

It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.

Why My Fourth Amendment Might Be Protected Even if Yours is Not

-- By AhiranisCastillo - 05 Mar 2024

Section I

The Fourth Amendment serves to protect the rights of individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by government authorities. It reads, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

In essence, this amendment safeguards the privacy and security of individuals by requiring that searches and seizures by the government be conducted under specific conditions. These conditions include obtaining a warrant from a judge, supported by probable cause, which particularly describes the place to be searched and the items or individuals to be seized. An individual, then, has a right to their own privacy and any information that the government extracts about that individual must follow protocol.

The digital age thus presents an entirely new realm of questions for our right to privacy. We live in an age where people freely and obliviously hand over personal information to their phones and devices. That information is then passed around to countless third parties that use it to generate data and sell ads. The government may also use this data in ways that citizens are not explicitly consenting to.

Here's the thing – my phone knows more about myself than I do. It’s not uncommon for me to receive a notification that my balance is off, that I haven’t consumed enough water in a day, or even that I am set to ovulate in a few days. I feed information to my phone and it digests me, studies me, predicts me – and yes, changes me.

But when I think about this relative to the Fourth Amendment, I focus on one word: secure. I have the right to be secure in my person, house, papers, etc. And while it sometimes can feel like I am living in a real-life adaptation of 1984, and I do believe there needs to be more transparency about what happens with our data, I don’t feel that I am not secure.

If anything, some of what other people would consider invasive and personal makes me feel more secure. Where does that leave me?

It means one of two things must be true: either there is something more of a case-by-case basis of whether people feel that their Fourth Amendment right has been trespassed on, or the brain-altering power of technology has worked on me, and my rights are being violated regardless of my opinion.

Still, I believe this is a complicated question on the language of the Fourth Amendment, particularly the phrase be secure and a matter of what it means in this expansive technological era.


You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list.


Revision 2r2 - 25 Apr 2024 - 19:00:22 - EbenMoglen
Revision 1r1 - 05 Mar 2024 - 22:25:31 - AhiranisCastillo
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM