| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstPaper" |
|---|
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted. | | | Apple’s digital hub is combined with its branding strategy. In 2010, Apple spent $691 million on advertisements aimed at developing consumer goodwill. Early iPod posters depicted “cool” silhouettes in dynamic poses that contrast with the white iPod (for a company that claimed to promote the individual “I” in its products, it has surely come to view its consumers as faceless shadows behind its product). As a result, Apple products scream “social status symbol,” and the company can charge high premiums. | |
<
< | Without a doubt, Apple has created some truly cutting-edge products, but at what cost? The consumers crave these devices and are willing to line up—even mob Apple stores—in the thousands to purchase a marginally upgraded product bearing the Apple logo. They want to be part of something larger than themselves, they want a bite at the cultural phenomenon of Apple. As a result, Apple is becoming ubiquitous in American homes. | >
> | Without a doubt, Apple has created some truly cutting-edge products, but at what cost? The consumers crave these devices and are willing to line up—even mob Apple stores—in the thousands to purchase a marginally upgraded product bearing the Apple logo. They want to be part of something larger than themselves, they want a bite at the cultural phenomenon of Apple. As a result, Apple is also becoming ubiquitous in American homes. | | |
A Bit on Facebook | | | Convenience Over Privacy
The Problem | |
<
< | Ever since cavemen learned to hunt in groups instead of individually hunting, humans have valued convenience over privacy. We give up some privacy to have meaningful (or trivial) interactions with each other all the time. Yet at this time in the digital age, third party “net” corporations—those that provide products or services on or related to the internet—know and remember more about their consumers than ever before. The average consumer is, at best, unaware of the extent to which his privacy is being sacrificed and traded. At worst, he knows his privacy is compromised, yet he does nothing and remains complacent, choosing instead to enjoy the convenience of Facebook through Google’s Chrome on an iPad. | >
> | Ever since cavemen learned to hunt in groups instead of individually hunting, humans have valued convenience over privacy. We give up some privacy to have meaningful (or trivial) interactions with each other all the time. Yet at this time in the digital age, third party "net corporations"—those that provide products or services on or related to the internet—know and remember more about their consumers than ever before. The average consumer is, at best, unaware of the extent to which his privacy is being sacrificed and traded. At worst, he knows his privacy is compromised, yet he does nothing and remains complacent, choosing instead to enjoy the convenience of Facebook through Google’s Chrome on an iPad. | | | A Solution
Some state that privacy is dead, and perhaps it is at this very moment, but it doesn’t have to be. A number of factors must be met before consumers can reclaim (some of) their privacy. | |
<
< | First, consumers have to be educated as to the risks involved when they buy Apple products, post on Facebook, or run searches in Google. There’s no short supply of news stories and articles on the web regarding these net corporations, and that is surprising, given that the news media benefits from net corporations and social media. | >
> | First, consumers have to be educated as to the risks involved when they buy Apple products, post on Facebook, or run searches in Google. There’s no short supply of news stories and articles on the web regarding these net corporations, and that is surprising, given that the news media benefits from net corporations and social networking. | | | | |
<
< | Second, and this is the hard party, there has to be some market alternative to the existing products and services. Legislation from tech savvy, benevolent politicians might be helpful in trying to pass stricter privacy laws, but special interest groups (namely Apple, Facebook, and Google) would certainly try to kill or dilute any legislation with bite. Likewise, the public cannot wait for favorable decisions from the Supreme Court justices, who for the foreseeable future, are less aware and less tech savvy than Congress. Market solutions in the form of competition from new companies seem to be the only potential way forward. | >
> | Second, and this is the hard part, there has to be some market alternative to the existing products and services. Legislation from tech savvy, benevolent politicians might be helpful in trying to pass stricter privacy laws, but special interest groups would certainly try to kill, dilute, and influence any legislation with bite. Likewise, the public cannot wait for favorable decisions from the Supreme Court justices, who for the foreseeable future, are less aware and less tech savvy than Congress. Market solutions in the form of competition from new companies seem to be the only potential way forward. | | | Third, and most importantly, the new competing companies must have superior marketing techniques. They will not be able to depend on the consumer to make an educated decision to leave Facebook for a more private alternative. Unfortunately, the consumer must be tricked into wanting privacy. He must believe that the alternative was marketed specifically for him, and once he is hooked, he must subconsciously believe he needs the alternative more than it needs him. Because he does. |
|