Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r3  >  r2  ...
BlaineTracyFirstPaper 3 - 22 Apr 2024 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Deleted:
<
<		It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
 

The Normative Case Against Automated License Plate Recognition

Line: 22 to 21
 The immense surveillance scheme enabled by ALPR runs into several problems with the intent and language of the Constitution. Its comprehensive capture of personal information and warrantless use run afoul of the Constitution’s protections for private citizens.
Added:
>
>
The reader cannot just take this in without wanting to know why. At least a sentence or two here to outline the argument is desirable or the reader may give up.

 

The First Amendment

The ability of ALPR systems to track an individual’s personal life conflicts with the First Amendment’s protections for people’s freedoms of speech and association. These protections were enshrined in the Constitution to secure, in part, the ability of individuals to share ideas and form associations unsanctioned by or critical of the government. A political dissident has the same right to communicate his ideas and form a group of likeminded compatriots as does a supporter of popular ideals. However, the dissident is much more likely to be targeted by the state for surveillance and curtailing of his activities.

Added:
>
>
How to get from reading the deliberately highly-legible registration tag on automobiles to the First Amendment is not a step you can take so blithely

 ALPR use imposes a chilling effect on speech with which the government at large or law enforcement specifically disagrees. Knowledge that a speaker of unpopular ideas could give a speech at a rally or protest and have her vehicle tracked to and from the event will surely deter some individuals from civic participation. The marketplace of ideas envisioned through the First Amendment will suffer because the state may use ALPR to surveil the activities of individuals without cause or public oversight. It will likewise dampen the ability and willingness of individuals to form associations they would prefer to keep private from the eyes of the state. These consequences span beyond even political affiliations. The imposition of a comprehensive vehicle surveillance system could track the activities of people engaged in same-sex relationships, or the attendees at a mosque, or the patients and employees at an abortion clinic. All manner of personal, private activities are made the business of the state when the government has such an overwhelming system of travel surveillance.

The Fourth Amendment

Line: 34 to 41
 Law enforcement’s ability to collect, search, employ, and redistribute this information without the issuance of a warrant exacerbates this constitutional problem. It amplifies the unreasonableness of the ALPR surveillance system and calls into question the rights of individuals to due process. When personal data can be gathered and used without probable cause or any formal legal sanction, it deprives the victims of this surveillance of their ability to ensure fairness and proper procedure in their treatment. Popular oversight and transparency are nonexistent in the current ALPR regime.
Added:
>
>
Improving the draft means addressing the central question. Automobiles are registered by the states, and are required to display highly-legible tags bearing the registration information. They are intended to communicate information that you do not dispute it is constitutional to require displayed. How then is there a constitutional problem with acquiring the information whose publication can be constitutionally required? You cite3 no cases of analogous holding, and I think there aren't any. So saying something more is clearly necessary.

 
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

Revision 3r3 - 22 Apr 2024 - 14:52:08 - EbenMoglen
Revision 2r2 - 01 Mar 2024 - 19:12:49 - BlaineTracy
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM