Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r3  >  r2  ...
ChristineOttoJournal 3 - 06 Apr 2020 - Main.ChristineOtto
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="StudentJournal"

ChristineOtto's Journal

Line: 14 to 14
  Thanks for these thoughts. We'll talk more about your first point in the next weeks. I hope my second talk on PartSix, which was built around your insight here, was helpful. I'm going to return to the idea of privacy-positive government, not merely in the area of criminal justice, in Part Nine.

Added:
>
>		At the moment it seems to be difficult not to talk about the corono virus. It largely influences our days - whether through lockdowns imposed in most coutries, online classes at for students, etc. It is dominating people's thoughts and interactions. However, on top of that an associated thought that is now constantly present for is the issue of privacy concerns amplified by the current situation. Despite having to socially isolate (which would usually mean more privacy) privacy is decreasing as we are to a large degree reliant on technology to keep in contact with friends, family and colleagues. And as can be seen by the news reporting on Zoom our privacy is not guaranteed by such tools. For most classes students are expected to attend classes over Zoom and the universtiy and most professors have not adequately addressed privacy concerns. As you have pointedly said Zoom depicts an astaunding assault upon educational privacy and freedom of thought. It is incomprehensible to me why the university chose to spend so much money on an insecure tool when there are more secure and free tools suchs as Jitsi. This morning I've heard in the news that Austria is considering to use a voluntary tracking app. The idea behind making the app voluntary is clear and seems at the first thought to be sensible. Nevertheless, something irritated me even about a voluntary tracking app. I fear that you don't have to make the app obligatory to pressure and shame people into installing it ("for the greater good"). In general, I am currently tackling the challenge of trying to be less easily surveilled and to protect my privacy while also continuing to do my work for university and not becoming a recluse.

Looking at the 6th Amendment in the 21th century an important question is whether the Constitution should be adjusted to reflect today's technological capabilities. As you have said the Bill of Rights is insufficient for future society which is to be expected as it was written in the 18th century. It should reflect and protect the citizen from the information asymmetry - a thought that is already rudimentally reflected in the 6th Amendment which seeks to equalize information access but is not oriented towards the modern technological situation.

On the first technology project: I have created GPG key but am unsure of where to upload it (what/where are the keyservers?).

 


Revision 3r3 - 06 Apr 2020 - 06:59:27 - ChristineOtto
Revision 2r2 - 05 Apr 2020 - 13:57:15 - EbenMoglen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM