Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r16  >  r15  ...
DanaDelgerFirstPaper 16 - 15 Apr 2009 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
Changed:
<
<
META TOPICPARENT name="PartFour"
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
 -- DanaDelger - 15 Feb 2009

I was thirteen when I killed my first deer, the shot flying forth from my hands, an incantation to crumple cities and knees. My father and I follow the bullet’s path, running long across a Wyoming plain. We stand above it, knives in hand, our breath half-frozen before it leaves our lungs, and when I am ready, we kneel down, a prayer. He shows me how the knife goes in—working from the soft belly up to the ribs, his big bear hands cracking open the cavity, as easy as my mother’s spoon at Sunday supper. We take out the intestines first, quickly to avoid tainting the meat, and work our way upwards. I put my hands so deep inside I lose sight. I pull out the heart and cradle it--- such a small, small thing, but something else also. Then I know why my father has taken me here. He leans in close and says: You have to know how to do this. You have to be ready for what comes.

Line: 96 to 96
 -- RickSchwartz - 9 Mar 2009
Added:
>
>
  • I must say I think everyone was rather long-winded about this one, if scrupulously polite, which I should learn to imitate. I think everyone is right, though everyone forgot to say how well-written this is.

  • As it happens, totally by accident, I think my terminology is right: this essay raises all the aspects of privacy: secrecy, anonymity and (you all forgot to say) autonomy. It also raises Frederick Jackson Turner: it's the frontier you're is writing about, and I think your invocation of its values is as clear (and as clearly differentiated from what the frontier always understands so viscerally about "city ways," which is that the latrine is always too close to the well) as can be. "Self- sufficiency makes privacy" is as basic a relation, where "privacy" means "autonomy" in my nomenclature, as you can get. I'm not sure whether your first deer is quite as big a moment in American privacy as when Thoreau pretended to eat raw woodchuck (well, after all, there was nobody around to see whether he did or not), but I agree that you've properly evoked the absolutely crucial environmental meaning of privacy that comes of moving away when you can smell the smoke from another man's chimney. Here we breathe nothing else all the time. Interdependency, here, is the background to the struggle for privacy. Most people's issue with you seemed to be that you said the struggle here had been conceded. This they objected to, as though the mere fact of a window, let alone a thousand or ten thousand windows looking in at your window isn't in itself the concession.

  • At any rate, I don't think this needs anything. What could be done, you did.
 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

META TOPICMOVED by="EbenMoglen" date="1234736691" from="CompPrivConst.DanaDelger-FirstPaper" to="CompPrivConst.DanaDelgerFirstPaper"

Revision 16r16 - 15 Apr 2009 - 18:56:12 - EbenMoglen
Revision 15r15 - 09 Mar 2009 - 23:56:21 - RickSchwartz
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM