Computers, Privacy & the Constitution	View r2 > r1 ...
Main AmLegalHist CompPrivConst EngLegalHist LawContempSoc LawNetSoc TWiki

DanielHarrisFirstPaper 2 - 02 Mar 2009 - Main.DanielHarris

Line: 1 to 1

META TOPICPARENT	name="FirstPaper%25"

Deleted:

<
<

In Defense of RFID

In Defense of RFID

Line: 7 to 6

-- By DanielHarris - 20 Feb 2009

Added:

>
>

What baby am I saving? - Transaction Time / efficiency - durability

On Howling - passive - range limitations / possibilities - shielding options (or why you can't wardrive for passports) - Some Biometrics Howl, Too

The Real Problem: it makes pervasive ID too easy - fight that one on its merits - let's use it for money and not for ID -- but if you're carrying a cash card it's trivial to associate with ID - just as true for non-RFID. avoiding the direct link and making the private bad guy work harder is a reasonable safeguard. - ID vs. inconvenience (after-hours access)

Section I

DanielHarrisFirstPaper 1 - 20 Feb 2009 - Main.DanielHarris

Line: 1 to 1

Added:

>
>

META TOPICPARENT	name="FirstPaper%25"

In Defense of RFID
- Section I
  - Subsection A
    - Subsub 1
  - Subsection B
    - Subsub 1
    - Subsub 2
- Section II
  - Subsection A
  - Subsection B

In Defense of RFID

-- By DanielHarris - 20 Feb 2009

Section I

Subsection A

Subsub 1

Subsection B

Subsub 1

Subsub 2

Section II

Subsection A

Subsection B

Revision 2	r2 - 02 Mar 2009 - 15:43:46 - DanielHarris
Revision 1	r1 - 20 Feb 2009 - 04:19:50 - DanielHarris

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.

Syndicate this site RSS ATOM