Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r6  >  r5  ...
MarvinGallowayFirstPaper 6 - 05 Apr 2021 - Main.MarvinGalloway
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Line: 34 to 34
 Democrats on the contrary have called for increased content moderation by platforms and have threatened to repeal the immunity provision if more stringent enforcement of protections against hate speech do not take place. Proactive moderation in order to keep a liability shield could certainly be interpreted to be philosophically opposite of the neutrality proposals made by Republicans.

Subsection B (Why Section 230 should survive)

Changed:
<
<
>
>		In this section I aim to discuss reasons why reforming Section 230 seems unfeasible and unlikely. Furthermore, I want to point out how. Currently proposed alternatives possess intricate downsides as compared to Section 230 in its current state.
 
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.

Revision 6r6 - 05 Apr 2021 - 21:23:25 - MarvinGalloway
Revision 5r5 - 05 Apr 2021 - 18:07:49 - MarvinGalloway
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM