Digital Sequestration

I think this is a forceful demonstration that "digital sequestration" is not a conceptual substitute for physical sequestration. This is not a trivial conclusion, worthy of the work of getting to it, but I think the best route to improvement is to adjust the vantage. I think the real question has to do with cases involving so much trial publicity as to raise questions about how jurors can manage their connection to the Net. What might courts try so as to preserve their jurors' insulation from intrusive non-evidence while allowing them as much normal digital life as possible? This is not necessarily about the period of deliberations only. Ordering jurors not to read coverage of the trial in newspapers and to turn off the television if the trial was mentioned was surely reasonable in the 20th century. What is now?