Law in Contemporary Society

View   r65  >  r64  ...
AndrewGradman-SecondPaper 65 - 14 Apr 2008 - Main.AndrewGradman
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
READY FOR GRADING
open for commenting
Line: 16 to 16
 But this scene comes from the middle of a larger story. The explanation for how my words triggered Eben's inquiry into my father's surgical specialty (which happens to be vascular) lies in whatever made me conceive those words, by which I mean, my life up to that point. I've always regarded myself both blessed and cursed to be among those who are well-educated and highly perceptive. We are both blessed and cursed, you and I, and all of us, in that we cannot disprove what Voltaire meant only ironically: “to understand all is to forgive all." The more we learn about the Antagonists we think harmed us, the harder it is to define boundaries around some thing about them that we'd benefit to target with our moral indignation. When we learn that our enemies "know not what they do" and forgive them, we can blame their educations; but when we learn that their educators also knew not what they were doing -- blame flees forgiveness all the way back to Creation.
Changed:
<
<
Which is satisfactory, if you’re Christian ... But I’m Jewish. That is to say: if Judaeo-Christianity makes brains schizophrenic, my identity is the one that's been taught -- COMMANDED --
>
>
Which is satisfactory, if you’re Christian ... but I’m Jewish.

That is to say: if the Judaeo-Christian man/woman is a schizophrenic, the pathologically Jewish-brained education is one that burdens the student at every moment with the teaching -- the COMMANDMENT --

 
  • to believe that his social position, and the information impacting him about others’ social positions, can never be “arbitrary,” --
  • to ignore what he's learning about physics, biology, evolution, psychology, sociology, and path-dependant accounts of history—because all of these bottom-up accounts are ruled, from the top down, by Morality, --
  • to ACT! as though beneath the descriptive meanings he's so adept at finding, there lie latent normative meanings, for the very purpose of finding which, his parents gave him his smarts.
Changed:
<
<
And yet, for all my blessed perceptiveness, I've never yet revealed a single one of these meanings. And that's the curse -- to be apathetic towards things that should make a mensch indignant.
>
>
And yet, for all my blessed perceptiveness, I've never yet revealed a single one of these meanings. And that's the curse of Jewish brain syndrome -- to be apathetic towards things that should make a mensch indignant.
 
  • I hesitate before making Holocaust jokes, not because they make me uncomfortable, but they make others uncomfortable, and those people then attack me. What do they have, that I lack, that they know to be indignant?
  • When I deferred my admission to Columbia Law School for a year—and worked for the American Jewish Committee, to learn what issues I should be concerned about -- I emerged a year later with a list, but I couldn't care less whether I ever checked anything off that list. Even today, I still have no idea what order I'm to go about crossing things off.

My curse: that the only indignity I can justify is against myself. "Don't forgive me, Lord! I know not what to do."

Changed:
<
<
Thus, when I answered Eben's question, I presented the phenotype of a Jewish son -- the son of Jewish parents -- Jewish, that is, in that they wanted me to understand the world in order to change it -- to get educated in order to get power -- but parents in that they also wanted proof that I would do so ...
  • Parents face a dilemma -- their control over our choices must eventually end -- such that the rational response is to train a child to seem rather than to be.
>
>
Thus, when I answered Eben's question, I presented the phenotype of a Jewish son -- the son of Jewish parents: Jewish, that is, in that they wanted me to understand the world in order to change it / to get educated in order to get power; but parents, in that they also wanted proof that I would do so ...
  • Given that parents' control over our choices must eventually end, their rational response has been to train their children to seem rather than to be.
 
    • first training us to seek things verifiably (call it "language acquisition");
Changed:
<
<
    • and since their surveillance must eventually end too, conforming our actions, while still surveillable, towards choosing the visible trappings of what they think is best for us (call it "language control").
But the tool of seeming, in the hands of parents [of any persuasion] who want us to know, in order to act (or, to do well by doing good) is much better calibrated to identifying changing the world (doing well) than to verifiably changing it for the better and not for the worse (doing good)
  • just as it's easier for a surgeon to do good for organs but bad for the patient (cf effect of cheap MRIs ( 1 and 2 / my dad's mafioso stroke patient, "I knew something was wrong when I couldn't pull the trigger);
  • or easy for lawyer to do well for the client but bad for society.
I, like everyone, was therefore taught to favor doing well over doing good—indoctrinated to use education to inject myself into power, and to postpone figuring out why I deserved that power until I'd consolidated it.
>
>
    • and then conforming our actions, while still surveillable, towards choosing the visible trappings of what they think is best for us (call it "language control").

But the tool of seeming, in the hands of parents [of any persuasion] who want us to know, in order to act / get educated, in order to get power / do well by doing good is much better calibrated to identifying the trappings of values -- getting university degrees, wearing suits, winning cases, getting ribbons, seizing levers, doing well -- than it is to evaluating the quality of values -- learning at a university, raising the living standards of thousands of people, spreading justice, doing good. I, like everyone, was therefore taught to favor doing well over doing good—indoctrinated to use education to inject myself into power, and to postpone figuring out why I deserved that power until I'd consolidated it. Just as it's easier for a surgeon to do good for organs but bad for the patient (cf effect of cheap MRIs ( 1 and 2 / my dad's mafioso stroke patient, "I knew something was wrong when I couldn't pull the trigger); it was easier for me to go to law school, than for me to get a Ph.D.; and it would be easier for me to go to a law firm, than to do the same.

 
Changed:
<
<
Eben understood how this happened to me, and so he forgave me; but only if you read "forgiveness" flexibly, to include the forgiveness of Maimonides (what Eben calls "charity by stealth") -- he indicted my history to my face. My HISTORY: not me. He attacked my history, my assumptions, my sociology, my upbringing -- everything that CONCEIVED me. "For this sin of making you hate yourself, Forgive YOURSELF -- YOU know not what you do; blame your SOCIETY for making you feel this way -- AND CHANGE IT." Which was the only kind of indictment that could break through my precocious Jewish-boy graph-paper brain-cage. He indicted society because it made me.
>
>
Upbringings are determined by Darwin and Veblen to evolve this way. So Eben must have understood this -- or else why would he have forgiven me? -- reading "forgiveness" flexibly, to include the forgiveness of Maimonides (what Eben calls "charity by stealth"), indicting my history to my face. My HISTORY: not me. He attacked my history, my assumptions, my sociology, my upbringing -- everything that EVOLVED me, everything that CONCEIVED me. He indicted society because it made me. "For this sin of making you hate yourself, Forgive YOURSELF -- YOU know not what you do; blame your SOCIETY for making you feel this way -- AND CHANGE IT." Which was the only kind of indictment that could break through my precocious Jewish-boy graph-paper brain-cage.
 Of course, I didn't hear it that way. I thought he was indicting me directly, and I took it personally -- and so this is what I heard:
    Of course your Jewish-boy head prefers finding descriptive truths rather than normative truths; your father taught you to be this way, to make you a good boy, because it made him a good surgeon. But fathers, though perhaps moral authorities, cannot be their sons' moral authorities.
Changed:
<
<
Living in pluralist America, where Jew and Christian and everyone must coexist, we need to outgrow our parochial authorities, and translate our values into common authorities, secular ones. If Jewish moral authority came from Rabbis, men who studied Torah, then in a secular era we must study, all of us, those whose goal in studying Truth is to reveal NEW ETHICS, not to ossify the old. The story of Socrates becomes our Creation myth -- the Big Bang of secular gestures towards justice.
>
>
Living in pluralist America, where Jew and Christian and everyone must coexist, we need to outgrow our parochial authorities, and translate our values into common authorities, secular ones. If Jewish moral authority came from Rabbis, men who studied Torah, then in a secular era we must study, all of us, those whose goal in studying Truth is to reveal NEW ETHICS, not to ossify the old. Then the story of Socrates becomes our Creation myth -- the Big Bang of secular gestures towards justice -- and today we must associate with his followers -- people who study justice by listening for it.
 
Changed:
<
<
Why did Eben write that note to the registrar, based on what I said in response? We'd have to know everything that he hoped would follow that meeting. We would have to derive a new Republic. But there's not enough time, and words remaining, in this paper, and this month of the semester, and this century, for us to have that conversation. We get busier every year. And so I'll postpone, until I'm given a chance to improve my writing, asking my question -- of what we share, with others who listened, with certainty.
>
>
Why did Eben write that note to the registrar, based on what I said in response? We'd have to know everything that he hoped would follow that meeting. We would have to derive a new Republic. But there's not enough time, and words remaining, in this paper, and this month of the semester, and this century, for us to have that conversation. We get busier every year, and my writing isn't getting any clearer. And so until I'm given a chance to identify my language problem, we'll postpone our dialog, about what it is that we're listening for, and who we are when we're listening.
 
Changed:
<
<
If you're still confused, don't blame the idea -- blame my failure to express the idea. We should talk again soon.
>
>
If you're confused, don't blame the idea -- blame my failure to express it. We'll talk.
 -- AndrewGradman - 13 Apr 2008

Revision 65r65 - 14 Apr 2008 - 15:21:45 - AndrewGradman
Revision 64r64 - 14 Apr 2008 - 05:38:09 - AndrewGradman
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM