Law in Contemporary Society

View   r7  >  r6  >  r5  >  r4  >  r3  >  r2  ...
BalancingWork 7 - 26 Jan 2008 - Main.MakalikaNaholowaa
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
-- CarinaWallance - 25 Jan 2008
Line: 35 to 35
 

-- BarbPitman - 26 Jan 2008

Added:
>
>

I was being sarcastic guys (by referring to the attorney community as "poor and exploited") - sorry I made that unclear, I have to remember that this is a conversation with people who don't know me.

-- MakalikaNaholowaa - 26 Jan 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

BalancingWork 6 - 26 Jan 2008 - Main.TheodoreSmith
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
-- CarinaWallance - 25 Jan 2008
Line: 6 to 6
 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/24/fashion/24WORK.html?ex=1358917200&en=47
Changed:
<
<
>
>

 Thanks for the link!
Line: 27 to 27
 -- SandorMarton - 26 Jan 2008
Added:
>
>
  • Well played mate, however I think he was being sarcastic. =)
    -- TheodoreSmith - 26 Jan 2008
 Carina, I assume that you are interested in balanced work hours because you are interested in having a family and assume that you will be sharing or shouldering the caregiver duties and logistics. As the article indicates, many firms offer various versions of lower hours for lower pay with (usually) less job security, and women are often interested in these mommy track options. My suggestion would be to note while you are summering at a given firm just what its official mommy tracks are, how many women are engaged in those tracks, and where they are in their tracks. Although "big firm" is usually stereotyped both generally and by community, keep in mind that each firm, practice area, and partner has its own culture and internal and street reputation, along with its own tolerance for or acceptance of alternative work options. Note the partner/associate ratio in a given practice area, and note whether and how many attorneys hold themselves out as practicing in more than one area. To you, it's the individual people who make the difference -- so use those lunch "chits" and other social opportunities to get to know others and figure out how you can fit in, be a part of, and add to that culture. Best wishes.

BalancingWork 5 - 26 Jan 2008 - Main.BarbPitman
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
-- CarinaWallance - 25 Jan 2008
Line: 28 to 28
 -- SandorMarton - 26 Jan 2008
Changed:
<
<
Carina, I assume that you are interested in balanced work hours because you are interested in having a family and assume that you will be sharing or shouldering the caregiver duties and logistics. As the article indicates, many firms offer various versions of lower hours for lower pay with (usually) less job security, and women are often interested in these mommy track options. My suggestion would be to note while you are summering at a given firm just what its official mommy tracks are, how many women are engaged in those tracks, and where they are in their tracks. Although "big firm" is usually stereotyped both generally and by community, keep in mind that each firm, practice area, and partner has its own culture and internal and street reputation, along with its own tolerance of or acceptance for alternative work options. Note the partner/associate ratio in a given practice area, and note whether and how many attorneys hold themselves out as practicing in more than one area. To you, it's the individual people who make the difference -- so use those lunch "chits" and other social opportunities to get to know others and figure out how you can fit in, be a part of, and add to that culture. Best wishes.
>
>
Carina, I assume that you are interested in balanced work hours because you are interested in having a family and assume that you will be sharing or shouldering the caregiver duties and logistics. As the article indicates, many firms offer various versions of lower hours for lower pay with (usually) less job security, and women are often interested in these mommy track options. My suggestion would be to note while you are summering at a given firm just what its official mommy tracks are, how many women are engaged in those tracks, and where they are in their tracks. Although "big firm" is usually stereotyped both generally and by community, keep in mind that each firm, practice area, and partner has its own culture and internal and street reputation, along with its own tolerance for or acceptance of alternative work options. Note the partner/associate ratio in a given practice area, and note whether and how many attorneys hold themselves out as practicing in more than one area. To you, it's the individual people who make the difference -- so use those lunch "chits" and other social opportunities to get to know others and figure out how you can fit in, be a part of, and add to that culture. Best wishes.
 

-- BarbPitman - 26 Jan 2008


BalancingWork 4 - 26 Jan 2008 - Main.BarbPitman
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
-- CarinaWallance - 25 Jan 2008
Line: 26 to 26
 "Poor exploited attorney community?" Perhaps I am misunderstanding you/missing something.

-- SandorMarton - 26 Jan 2008

Added:
>
>

Carina, I assume that you are interested in balanced work hours because you are interested in having a family and assume that you will be sharing or shouldering the caregiver duties and logistics. As the article indicates, many firms offer various versions of lower hours for lower pay with (usually) less job security, and women are often interested in these mommy track options. My suggestion would be to note while you are summering at a given firm just what its official mommy tracks are, how many women are engaged in those tracks, and where they are in their tracks. Although "big firm" is usually stereotyped both generally and by community, keep in mind that each firm, practice area, and partner has its own culture and internal and street reputation, along with its own tolerance of or acceptance for alternative work options. Note the partner/associate ratio in a given practice area, and note whether and how many attorneys hold themselves out as practicing in more than one area. To you, it's the individual people who make the difference -- so use those lunch "chits" and other social opportunities to get to know others and figure out how you can fit in, be a part of, and add to that culture. Best wishes.

-- BarbPitman - 26 Jan 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

BalancingWork 3 - 26 Jan 2008 - Main.SandorMarton
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
-- CarinaWallance - 25 Jan 2008
Line: 13 to 13
 It seems like workers get improved worker treatment either when the government steps in to require it or the employers must to ensure that supply of workers meets their demand. I can't see legislatures stepping in to help the poor exploited attorney community anytime soon, and it seems like outsourcing is going to move the supply/demand issue in the firms' favor. So how does that effect the future of efforts like these, to achieve better working conditions for us at firms in the next 5 years? Can't be good...

-- MakalikaNaholowaa - 26 Jan 2008

Added:
>
>

The concern is the working condition of big law attorneys?

Over the past decade or two, firms have drastically increased starting pay as well as the number of hours required. There are very few (if any) other jobs where the entry level position pays $160,000 (not including bonus). If you don't want to earn that amount of money, you are free to find a firm that pays less and has a lower hours requirement.

Depending on the firm and the practice area, these attorneys seem to work something like 60-70 hours per week. Many salaried positions require something similar. Retail management comes to mind as an example.

Aside from the hours, big law work seems rather comfortable: you spend your day reading and writing in a climate controlled office. You get to sit in a chair. There is no risk of physical injury.

"Poor exploited attorney community?" Perhaps I am misunderstanding you/missing something.

-- SandorMarton - 26 Jan 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 7r7 - 26 Jan 2008 - 18:34:01 - MakalikaNaholowaa
Revision 6r6 - 26 Jan 2008 - 18:32:16 - TheodoreSmith
Revision 5r5 - 26 Jan 2008 - 17:31:26 - BarbPitman
Revision 4r4 - 26 Jan 2008 - 16:05:49 - BarbPitman
Revision 3r3 - 26 Jan 2008 - 14:49:58 - SandorMarton
Revision 2r2 - 26 Jan 2008 - 05:36:39 - MakalikaNaholowaa
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM