| |
CeciliaPlazaSecondEssay 4 - 31 May 2018 - Main.EbenMoglen
|
|
META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
| |
< < | | | For Present-Day-Me
-- By CeciliaPlaza - 14 Apr 2018 | | So, I guess I’ve answered my own question. | |
> > |
This does what a first draft should do: it gets your thinking on the
page. The draft both describes the problem and enacts it.
The emotional and intellectual center of the writing is your panel
experience, which both documents the collapse of your confidence and
perhaps illuminates some of the causes. As you write, one response
to discovering that your approach to law school admission was
atypical of those also speaking would have been "Okay, that's your
way; I did it my way." Another is to wonder, if you didn't do it
the other way, whether you belong at all. That this was the actual
outcome alerts us to the importance of the "not belonging" feeling
at the center of the syndrome from which you've been suffering.
"Not belonging" sensations are a rather common response to the way
law school withholds reinforcement and regresses peoples' adult
selves in the direction of high school. But for some students,
separated by class background, personal history, and other factors
from the population around them, the conviction that they are
ineradicably other can take very destructive hold. Your writing
also reminds us that previous experiences that led to doubts about
safety or belonging at earlier stages of educational life can cause
the present sense to redouble. Hence the significant designation,
"present-day me."
But the draft also recapitulates the experience you see as the low
point: it shows up wanting to be told how to get better. You feel
for yourself that being told how to get better isn't how to get
better. Regeneration lies in planning and executing it for oneself,
which is what your not-present-day selves have done so many other
times.
Another draft that draws upon Frank Putnam's summary of
personality-state theory might be productive for you. "Present-day
me" isn't a new and puzzlingly disabled identity standing alone:
it's a personality state, resulting from dissociations produced by
law school. It hasn't destroyed any other of your states, and
doesn't need to be destroyed itself. What is needed is merger,
communication between and incorporation of this and other states, to
produce growth through the phenomenon we call "change." This is how
we change, through the recognition and merger of separate
personality states into new and larger versions of ourselves. The
current draft stands opposed to "present-day me," not hostile to her
but afraid of the consequences and meaning of her existence. The
same materials, differently filtered through another kind of
writing, can show the clearer and yet not radically distorted view
of yourself—including but not limited to the silencing you've
experienced in law school—that is the regenerated image you
look for in your dream.
| | |
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|
| |