|
CharlesRoperSecondEssay 9 - 13 Jun 2016 - Main.CharlesRoper
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
| | | There is no denying that the ability for universal interconnection via the Internet has had huge ramifications worldwide. Not only does the Internet allow society to be conscious of the world around them, it also allows them to interact with the world on an unprecedented level. Furthermore, this virtual world interacting has the ability to promote new insights and diversity of thoughts aiding not only purely social relationships but also the advancement of business and technological ideas and innovations. However, this unprecedented level of universal interconnection may be bringing with it unprecedented drawbacks affecting human society as well. | |
<
< | Some scholars may be quick to dismiss the merits and seriousness of universal interconnection’s drawbacks. Said scholars typically note that although the technology may have changed it is still the same old criticism being flung towards it. Keith Hampton in his article NO: Relationships Are Being Enhanced, not Replaced perfectly illustrates this notion: “Yes, some things have changed—but maybe not as much as you might think. Consider ‘what a strange practice it is…that a man should sit down to his breakfast table and, instead of conversing with his wife, and children, hold before his face a sort of screen on which is inscribed a world-wide gossip.’ These words ring as true today as when they were written, in 1909. They were the observations of one of America’s first and most renowned sociologists, Charles Cooley, about how morning delivery of the newspaper was undermining the American family. Thank goodness the scourge of the newsman is in decline.” A prima facie analysis of these dismissals may even logically make sense. However, upon closer inspection and analysis psychological studies have revealed just how baseless defenses of universal interconnection truly are. | >
> | Some scholars may be quick to dismiss the merits and seriousness of universal interconnection’s drawbacks. Said scholars typically note that although the technology may have changed it is still the same old criticism being flung towards it. Keith Hampton in his article NO: Relationships Are Being Enhanced, not Replaced perfectly illustrates this notion: “Yes, some things have changed—but maybe not as much as you might think. Consider ‘what a strange practice it is…that a man should sit down to his breakfast table and, instead of conversing with his wife, and children, hold before his face a sort of screen on which is inscribed a world-wide gossip.’ These words ring as true today as when they were written, in 1909. They were the observations of one of America’s first and most renowned sociologists, Charles Cooley, about how morning delivery of the newspaper was undermining the American family. Thank goodness the scourge of the newsman is in decline.” A prima facie analysis of these dismissals may even logically make sense. However, upon closer inspection and analysis, psychological studies have revealed just how baseless defenses of universal interconnection truly are. | | |
Specifically, Sherry Turkle a psychologist and cultural analyst who through her world renowned books, “Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other” and “Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age”, and her recent TED Talk revealed her in-depth studies on how technology is shaping our modern relationships. Ms. Turkle’s studies have shown that when one uses the universal interconnecting technology to be socially connected with the world devastating side effects may occur. Studies note that when society is being “social” online they are only getting sips of connection and not real communication. Society is drawn to the Internet because it can provide the illusion of companionship without the demands of intimacy. However, society confuses postings and online sharing with authentic communication when in reality it is far from the virtues of person-to-person interactions. For instance studies have found that emotions including empathy can only be dispensed in the virtual world one-sixth as effective compared to real world person-to-person interactions. | |
<
< | While Ms. Turkle’s findings may not have been overly devastating if technology was being used solely to make global connections one would otherwise never be able to make; with the recent trend of society using the Internet to not only connect with individuals globally but also locally these drawbacks become exponentially more prevalent and dangerous. We are now a part of a society that chooses to the virtual world to interact over easier real world alternatives. In “Alone Together” Ms. Turkle notes an unfortunately too common occurrence of roommates/friends who are in the same house simply texting one another in their rooms rather than interacting in the real world. Furthermore even when two friends are meeting in the real world there is no escaping the technology: “Computers no longer wait for humans to project meaning onto them. Now, sociable robots meet our gaze, speak to us, and learn to recognize us. They ask us to take care of them; in response, we imagine that they might care for us in return.” See “Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other”. | >
> | While Ms. Turkle’s findings may not have been overly devastating if technology was being used solely to make global connections one would otherwise never be able to make; with the recent trend of society using the Internet to not only connect with individuals globally but also locally these drawbacks become exponentially more prevalent and dangerous. We are now a part of a society that chooses to use the virtual world to interact over easier real world alternatives. In “Alone Together” Ms. Turkle notes an unfortunately too common occurrence of roommates/friends who are in the same house simply texting one another in their rooms rather than interacting in the real world. Furthermore even when two friends are meeting in the real world there is no escaping the technology: “Computers no longer wait for humans to project meaning onto them. Now, sociable robots meet our gaze, speak to us, and learn to recognize us. They ask us to take care of them; in response, we imagine that they might care for us in return.” See “Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other”. | | | | |
<
< | I am not suggesting that there needs to be some type of ban on universal interconnection nor in in no way saying that this amazing ability and technology needs to be destroyed Rather, individuals need to stop being in denial about the effects and drawbacks these technology can have, especially when overly abused. Since virtual communications can be far less successful in dispensing emotions and connections it is important that real world relationships receive the attention required to maintain sociability. Unfortunately, this technology with it gaze capturing constant notifications and wants prevents this from occurring; the time and effort society puts into their virtual worlds distracts and limits the time that society has to connect and communicate on a deeper level in the real world. However, the technology itself does not deserve the full blame, the users/abusers are just as blameworthy, if not more. | >
> | I am not suggesting that there needs to be some type of ban on universal interconnection nor in in no way saying that this amazing ability and technology needs to be destroyed. Rather, individuals need to stop being in denial about the effects and drawbacks these technology can have, especially when overly abused. Since virtual communications can be far less successful in dispensing emotions and connections it is important that real world relationships receive the attention required to maintain sociability. Unfortunately, this technology with it gaze capturing constant notifications and wants prevents this from occurring; the time and effort society puts into their virtual worlds distracts and limits the time that society has to connect and communicate on a deeper level in the real world. However, the technology itself does not deserve the full blame, the users/abusers are just as blameworthy, if not more. | | | | |
<
< | Users have simply accepted with never questioning that the virtual world provides an “easier” form of companionship. The majority of users even believe that this form of companionship is even stronger and more meaning full than real world bonds because anyone at all times is only a few strokes of a keyboard away. However, users need to remove the wool that has been pulled over their eyes and see truly raw deal they are making. The use of universal interconnection technology on a global level is a great asset that deserves to be used to its fullest potential. However on the local level, given its drawbacks, this technology should only be used to foster real world person-to-person relationships, rather than replace them. | >
> | Users have simply accepted with never questioning that the virtual world provides an “easier” and "better" form of companionship. The majority of users even believe that this form of companionship is even stronger and more meaning full than real world bonds because anyone at all times is only a few keystrokes away. However, users need to remove the wool that has been self-pulled over their eyes and see the truly raw deal they are making. The use of universal interconnection technology on a global level is a great asset that deserves to be used to its fullest potential. However on the local level, given its drawbacks, this technology should only be used to foster real world person-to-person relationships, rather than replace them. | | |
|
|
|
CharlesRoperSecondEssay 8 - 13 Jun 2016 - Main.CharlesRoper
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
| | | Some scholars may be quick to dismiss the merits and seriousness of universal interconnection’s drawbacks. Said scholars typically note that although the technology may have changed it is still the same old criticism being flung towards it. Keith Hampton in his article NO: Relationships Are Being Enhanced, not Replaced perfectly illustrates this notion: “Yes, some things have changed—but maybe not as much as you might think. Consider ‘what a strange practice it is…that a man should sit down to his breakfast table and, instead of conversing with his wife, and children, hold before his face a sort of screen on which is inscribed a world-wide gossip.’ These words ring as true today as when they were written, in 1909. They were the observations of one of America’s first and most renowned sociologists, Charles Cooley, about how morning delivery of the newspaper was undermining the American family. Thank goodness the scourge of the newsman is in decline.” A prima facie analysis of these dismissals may even logically make sense. However, upon closer inspection and analysis psychological studies have revealed just how baseless defenses of universal interconnection truly are. | |
<
< | Specifically, Sherry Turkle a psychologist and cultural analyst who through her world renowned books, “Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other” and “Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age”, and her recent TED Talk revealed her in-depth studies on how technology is shaping our modern relationships. | >
> | Specifically, Sherry Turkle a psychologist and cultural analyst who through her world renowned books, “Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other” and “Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age”, and her recent TED Talk revealed her in-depth studies on how technology is shaping our modern relationships. Ms. Turkle’s studies have shown that when one uses the universal interconnecting technology to be socially connected with the world devastating side effects may occur. Studies note that when society is being “social” online they are only getting sips of connection and not real communication. Society is drawn to the Internet because it can provide the illusion of companionship without the demands of intimacy. However, society confuses postings and online sharing with authentic communication when in reality it is far from the virtues of person-to-person interactions. For instance studies have found that emotions including empathy can only be dispensed in the virtual world one-sixth as effective compared to real world person-to-person interactions. | | | | |
>
> | While Ms. Turkle’s findings may not have been overly devastating if technology was being used solely to make global connections one would otherwise never be able to make; with the recent trend of society using the Internet to not only connect with individuals globally but also locally these drawbacks become exponentially more prevalent and dangerous. We are now a part of a society that chooses to the virtual world to interact over easier real world alternatives. In “Alone Together” Ms. Turkle notes an unfortunately too common occurrence of roommates/friends who are in the same house simply texting one another in their rooms rather than interacting in the real world. Furthermore even when two friends are meeting in the real world there is no escaping the technology: “Computers no longer wait for humans to project meaning onto them. Now, sociable robots meet our gaze, speak to us, and learn to recognize us. They ask us to take care of them; in response, we imagine that they might care for us in return.” See “Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other”. | | | | |
>
> | I am not suggesting that there needs to be some type of ban on universal interconnection nor in in no way saying that this amazing ability and technology needs to be destroyed Rather, individuals need to stop being in denial about the effects and drawbacks these technology can have, especially when overly abused. Since virtual communications can be far less successful in dispensing emotions and connections it is important that real world relationships receive the attention required to maintain sociability. Unfortunately, this technology with it gaze capturing constant notifications and wants prevents this from occurring; the time and effort society puts into their virtual worlds distracts and limits the time that society has to connect and communicate on a deeper level in the real world. However, the technology itself does not deserve the full blame, the users/abusers are just as blameworthy, if not more. | | | | |
<
< |
Both Sides of the Coin
The Internet is Allowing People to be More Sociable
There are essentially two fronts to this argument. The first being that although the technology may have changed it is still the same old criticism being flung towards it. While the second prong states not only does the internet allow old relationships to be maintained it also fosters new relationships across the world, which with out the Internet would not be possible on such a large level.
New Technology Same Old Criticism
Keith Hampton in his article NO: Relationships Are Being Enhanced, not Replaced perfectly illustrates this prong: “Yes, some things have changed—but maybe not as much as you might think. Consider ‘what a strange practice it is…that a man should sit down to his breakfast table and, instead of conversing with his wife, and children, hold before his face a sort of screen on which is inscribed a world-wide gossip.’ These words ring as true today as when they were written, in 1909. They were the observations of one of America’s first and most renowned sociologists, Charles Cooley, about how morning delivery of the newspaper was undermining the American family. Thank goodness the scourge of the newsman is in decline.”
Enhanced Relationships Across the World
Not only does the Internet allow society to be conscious of the world around them, it also allows them to interact with the world on an unprecedented level. This interaction is not causing individuals to be less sociable just because it is not in the typical face-to-face method of interaction. Furthermore, this virtual world interacting does not come between individuals in the real world but rather promotes new insights and diversity of thoughts, which were gained in the virtual world, into the real world.
The Internet is Making People Less Sociable
There are essentially two fronts to this argument. The first being that the social interactions one has online is far less meaningful than the real life interactions. While the second prong states that the Internet is getting in the way and distracting users when in real world social interactions.
Far Less Meaningful Social Interactions
Sherry Turkle, a psychologist and cultural analyst who recently did a TED Talk on her studies on how technology is shaping our modern relationships, notes when society is being “social” online they are only getting sips of connection and not real communication. Ms. Turkle further highlights this prong of the argument by noting that society is drawn to the Internet because it can provide the illusion of companionship without the demands of intimacy. However, society confuses postings and online sharing with authentic communication when in reality it is far from the virtues of person-to-person interactions. For instance studies have found that emotions including empathy can only be dispensed in the virtual world one-sixth as effective compared to real world person-to-person interactions.
Distractions from Real World Interactions
Since studies have shown that virtual communications can be far less successful in dispensing emotions and connections it is important that real world relationships receive the attention required to maintain sociability. However, the Internet prevents this from occurring; the time and effort society puts into their virtual worlds distracts and limits the time that society has to connect and communicate on a deeper level in the real world. So although the internet may allow individuals to connect with more people across the world; theses connections are far less meaningful in comparison to real world person-to-person relationships. | >
> | Users have simply accepted with never questioning that the virtual world provides an “easier” form of companionship. The majority of users even believe that this form of companionship is even stronger and more meaning full than real world bonds because anyone at all times is only a few strokes of a keyboard away. However, users need to remove the wool that has been pulled over their eyes and see truly raw deal they are making. The use of universal interconnection technology on a global level is a great asset that deserves to be used to its fullest potential. However on the local level, given its drawbacks, this technology should only be used to foster real world person-to-person relationships, rather than replace them. | | |
|
|
|
CharlesRoperSecondEssay 7 - 13 Jun 2016 - Main.CharlesRoper
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
| |
<
< | Does The Internet Make People More or Less Sociable? | >
> | How is Universal Interconnection, Implemented Through the Current Architecture, Affecting Human Society?
 | | | -- By CharlesRoper - 30 Mar 2016 | |
<
< | A great debate exists over the impact the Internet has on society. There is no denying that the Internet has changed the very fabric of society, and has advanced and evolved mankind in unprecedented ways. However, when it comes to the social impacts the Internet has there is great debate over what humanity has become. | >
> | There is no denying that the ability for universal interconnection via the Internet has had huge ramifications worldwide. Not only does the Internet allow society to be conscious of the world around them, it also allows them to interact with the world on an unprecedented level. Furthermore, this virtual world interacting has the ability to promote new insights and diversity of thoughts aiding not only purely social relationships but also the advancement of business and technological ideas and innovations. However, this unprecedented level of universal interconnection may be bringing with it unprecedented drawbacks affecting human society as well. | | | | |
<
< | | >
> | Some scholars may be quick to dismiss the merits and seriousness of universal interconnection’s drawbacks. Said scholars typically note that although the technology may have changed it is still the same old criticism being flung towards it. Keith Hampton in his article NO: Relationships Are Being Enhanced, not Replaced perfectly illustrates this notion: “Yes, some things have changed—but maybe not as much as you might think. Consider ‘what a strange practice it is…that a man should sit down to his breakfast table and, instead of conversing with his wife, and children, hold before his face a sort of screen on which is inscribed a world-wide gossip.’ These words ring as true today as when they were written, in 1909. They were the observations of one of America’s first and most renowned sociologists, Charles Cooley, about how morning delivery of the newspaper was undermining the American family. Thank goodness the scourge of the newsman is in decline.” A prima facie analysis of these dismissals may even logically make sense. However, upon closer inspection and analysis psychological studies have revealed just how baseless defenses of universal interconnection truly are. | | | | |
<
< | This introduction conveys no new idea to the reader. The first and third sentences are repetitions of a flat tautology. It's as though the thinking will come later, in the course of the writing. | | | | |
<
< | But an essay of this sort cannot work that way. You need to present the reader with the result of the thinking at the outset. Then you show how you develop that idea from the materials you came by, and leave the reader at the conclusion with a route onward, in which she can take your idea into new terrain or new implications for herself. | >
> | Specifically, Sherry Turkle a psychologist and cultural analyst who through her world renowned books, “Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other” and “Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age”, and her recent TED Talk revealed her in-depth studies on how technology is shaping our modern relationships. | | | | |
<
< | | | | | | | There are essentially two fronts to this argument. The first being that although the technology may have changed it is still the same old criticism being flung towards it. While the second prong states not only does the internet allow old relationships to be maintained it also fosters new relationships across the world, which with out the Internet would not be possible on such a large level.
New Technology Same Old Criticism | |
<
< | | >
> | | | | Keith Hampton in his article NO: Relationships Are Being Enhanced, not Replaced perfectly illustrates this prong: “Yes, some things have changed—but maybe not as much as you might think. Consider ‘what a strange practice it is…that a man should sit down to his breakfast table and, instead of conversing with his wife, and children, hold before his face a sort of screen on which is inscribed a world-wide gossip.’ These words ring as true today as when they were written, in 1909. They were the observations of one of America’s first and most renowned sociologists, Charles Cooley, about how morning delivery of the newspaper was undermining the American family. Thank goodness the scourge of the newsman is in decline.”
Enhanced Relationships Across the World | |
<
< |  | >
> | | | | Not only does the Internet allow society to be conscious of the world around them, it also allows them to interact with the world on an unprecedented level. This interaction is not causing individuals to be less sociable just because it is not in the typical face-to-face method of interaction. Furthermore, this virtual world interacting does not come between individuals in the real world but rather promotes new insights and diversity of thoughts, which were gained in the virtual world, into the real world. | | | There are essentially two fronts to this argument. The first being that the social interactions one has online is far less meaningful than the real life interactions. While the second prong states that the Internet is getting in the way and distracting users when in real world social interactions.
Far Less Meaningful Social Interactions | |
<
< |  | >
> | | | | Sherry Turkle, a psychologist and cultural analyst who recently did a TED Talk on her studies on how technology is shaping our modern relationships, notes when society is being “social” online they are only getting sips of connection and not real communication. Ms. Turkle further highlights this prong of the argument by noting that society is drawn to the Internet because it can provide the illusion of companionship without the demands of intimacy. However, society confuses postings and online sharing with authentic communication when in reality it is far from the virtues of person-to-person interactions. For instance studies have found that emotions including empathy can only be dispensed in the virtual world one-sixth as effective compared to real world person-to-person interactions. | |
<
< |
Sherry's work is indeed the most important social psychology we have. But rather than reading Alone Together or Reclaiming Conversation, you watch a TED talk?
| | |
Distractions from Real World Interactions | |
<
< | 
Since studies have shown that virtual communications can be far less successful in dispensing emotions and connections it is important that real world relationships receive the attention required to maintain sociability. However, the Internet prevents this from occurring; the time and effort society puts into their virtual worlds distracts and limits the time that society has to connect and communicate on a deeper level in the real world. So although the internet may allow individuals to connect with more people across the world; theses connections are far less meaningful in comparison to real world person-to-person relationships. | | | | |
<
< |
Illustrations aren't analysis, and TED talks aren't where one looks for substance. | >
> | Since studies have shown that virtual communications can be far less successful in dispensing emotions and connections it is important that real world relationships receive the attention required to maintain sociability. However, the Internet prevents this from occurring; the time and effort society puts into their virtual worlds distracts and limits the time that society has to connect and communicate on a deeper level in the real world. So although the internet may allow individuals to connect with more people across the world; theses connections are far less meaningful in comparison to real world person-to-person relationships. | | | | |
<
< | The primary route to improvement here is better framing. "Is the
Internet A or B" is always hopeless. Presenting a binary choice
among offsetting inaccurate abstractions isn't good thinking for the
reader. The question is "How is universal interconnection
implemented through the current architecture affecting human
sociality?" Then we avoid fatal levels reductionism at the outset,
and are allowed to have thoughts more complex than binary choices. | | | | |
<
< | If watching talking heads videos is your preferred mode of research, I suppose this could be considered an attempt at another approach to your question. | | | | |
<
< | | | |
|
|
|
CharlesRoperSecondEssay 6 - 09 Jun 2016 - Main.EbenMoglen
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
| |
<
< | It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted. | | | Does The Internet Make People More or Less Sociable? | | | A great debate exists over the impact the Internet has on society. There is no denying that the Internet has changed the very fabric of society, and has advanced and evolved mankind in unprecedented ways. However, when it comes to the social impacts the Internet has there is great debate over what humanity has become. | |
>
> |
This introduction conveys no new idea to the reader. The first and third sentences are repetitions of a flat tautology. It's as though the thinking will come later, in the course of the writing.
But an essay of this sort cannot work that way. You need to present the reader with the result of the thinking at the outset. Then you show how you develop that idea from the materials you came by, and leave the reader at the conclusion with a route onward, in which she can take your idea into new terrain or new implications for herself.
| | | Both Sides of the Coin
The Internet is Allowing People to be More Sociable | | | Sherry Turkle, a psychologist and cultural analyst who recently did a TED Talk on her studies on how technology is shaping our modern relationships, notes when society is being “social” online they are only getting sips of connection and not real communication. Ms. Turkle further highlights this prong of the argument by noting that society is drawn to the Internet because it can provide the illusion of companionship without the demands of intimacy. However, society confuses postings and online sharing with authentic communication when in reality it is far from the virtues of person-to-person interactions. For instance studies have found that emotions including empathy can only be dispensed in the virtual world one-sixth as effective compared to real world person-to-person interactions. | |
>
> |
Sherry's work is indeed the most important social psychology we have. But rather than reading Alone Together or Reclaiming Conversation, you watch a TED talk?
| | | Distractions from Real World Interactions
Since studies have shown that virtual communications can be far less successful in dispensing emotions and connections it is important that real world relationships receive the attention required to maintain sociability. However, the Internet prevents this from occurring; the time and effort society puts into their virtual worlds distracts and limits the time that society has to connect and communicate on a deeper level in the real world. So although the internet may allow individuals to connect with more people across the world; theses connections are far less meaningful in comparison to real world person-to-person relationships. | |
>
> |
Illustrations aren't analysis, and TED talks aren't where one looks for substance.
The primary route to improvement here is better framing. "Is the
Internet A or B" is always hopeless. Presenting a binary choice
among offsetting inaccurate abstractions isn't good thinking for the
reader. The question is "How is universal interconnection
implemented through the current architecture affecting human
sociality?" Then we avoid fatal levels reductionism at the outset,
and are allowed to have thoughts more complex than binary choices.
If watching talking heads videos is your preferred mode of research, I suppose this could be considered an attempt at another approach to your question.
| | |
|
|
|
CharlesRoperSecondEssay 5 - 03 Apr 2016 - Main.CharlesRoper
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted. | | | Both Sides of the Coin
The Internet is Allowing People to be More Sociable | |
<
< | | >
> | There are essentially two fronts to this argument. The first being that although the technology may have changed it is still the same old criticism being flung towards it. While the second prong states not only does the internet allow old relationships to be maintained it also fosters new relationships across the world, which with out the Internet would not be possible on such a large level.
New Technology Same Old Criticism
Keith Hampton in his article NO: Relationships Are Being Enhanced, not Replaced perfectly illustrates this prong: “Yes, some things have changed—but maybe not as much as you might think. Consider ‘what a strange practice it is…that a man should sit down to his breakfast table and, instead of conversing with his wife, and children, hold before his face a sort of screen on which is inscribed a world-wide gossip.’ These words ring as true today as when they were written, in 1909. They were the observations of one of America’s first and most renowned sociologists, Charles Cooley, about how morning delivery of the newspaper was undermining the American family. Thank goodness the scourge of the newsman is in decline.” | | | | |
>
> | Enhanced Relationships Across the World
Not only does the Internet allow society to be conscious of the world around them, it also allows them to interact with the world on an unprecedented level. This interaction is not causing individuals to be less sociable just because it is not in the typical face-to-face method of interaction. Furthermore, this virtual world interacting does not come between individuals in the real world but rather promotes new insights and diversity of thoughts, which were gained in the virtual world, into the real world. | | |
The Internet is Making People Less Sociable | |
<
< | | | | | |
>
> | There are essentially two fronts to this argument. The first being that the social interactions one has online is far less meaningful than the real life interactions. While the second prong states that the Internet is getting in the way and distracting users when in real world social interactions.
Far Less Meaningful Social Interactions
Sherry Turkle, a psychologist and cultural analyst who recently did a TED Talk on her studies on how technology is shaping our modern relationships, notes when society is being “social” online they are only getting sips of connection and not real communication. Ms. Turkle further highlights this prong of the argument by noting that society is drawn to the Internet because it can provide the illusion of companionship without the demands of intimacy. However, society confuses postings and online sharing with authentic communication when in reality it is far from the virtues of person-to-person interactions. For instance studies have found that emotions including empathy can only be dispensed in the virtual world one-sixth as effective compared to real world person-to-person interactions.
Distractions from Real World Interactions
| | | | |
>
> | Since studies have shown that virtual communications can be far less successful in dispensing emotions and connections it is important that real world relationships receive the attention required to maintain sociability. However, the Internet prevents this from occurring; the time and effort society puts into their virtual worlds distracts and limits the time that society has to connect and communicate on a deeper level in the real world. So although the internet may allow individuals to connect with more people across the world; theses connections are far less meaningful in comparison to real world person-to-person relationships. | | | | | |
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="Social-Media.png" attr="" comment="" date="1459651751" name="Social-Media.png" path="Social-Media.png" size="218567" stream="Social-Media.png" user="Main.CharlesRoper" version="1" |
|---|
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="social-media-comms-e1416852285870.png" attr="" comment="" date="1459651762" name="social-media-comms-e1416852285870.png" path="social-media-comms-e1416852285870.png" size="218490" stream="social-media-comms-e1416852285870.png" user="Main.CharlesRoper" version="1" |
|---|
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="05172b0bcc5f10528912f499bee51c1406a7ec-wm.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1459651776" name="05172b0bcc5f10528912f499bee51c1406a7ec-wm.jpg" path="05172b0bcc5f10528912f499bee51c1406a7ec-wm.jpg" size="84564" stream="05172b0bcc5f10528912f499bee51c1406a7ec-wm.jpg" user="Main.CharlesRoper" version="1" |
|---|
| |
>
> |
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="newspaper_illo.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1459696187" name="newspaper_illo.jpg" path="newspaper_illo.jpg" size="282796" stream="newspaper_illo.jpg" user="Main.CharlesRoper" version="1" |
|---|
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="54441430.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1459696633" name="54441430.jpg" path="54441430.jpg" size="115095" stream="54441430.jpg" user="Main.CharlesRoper" version="1" |
|---|
|
|
|
CharlesRoperSecondEssay 4 - 03 Apr 2016 - Main.CharlesRoper
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted. | | | -- By CharlesRoper - 30 Mar 2016 | |
>
> | A great debate exists over the impact the Internet has on society. There is no denying that the Internet has changed the very fabric of society, and has advanced and evolved mankind in unprecedented ways. However, when it comes to the social impacts the Internet has there is great debate over what humanity has become. | | | | |
<
< | Section I | >
> | Both Sides of the Coin | | | | |
<
< | Subsection A | >
> | The Internet is Allowing People to be More Sociable
| | | | |
<
< | Subsub 1 | | | | |
<
< | Subsection B | | | | |
<
< | Subsub 1 | >
> | The Internet is Making People Less Sociable
| | | | |
<
< | Subsub 2 | | | | |
<
< | Section II
Subsection A
Subsection B | | |
| | |
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list. | |
>
> |
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="Social-Media.png" attr="" comment="" date="1459651751" name="Social-Media.png" path="Social-Media.png" size="218567" stream="Social-Media.png" user="Main.CharlesRoper" version="1" |
|---|
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="social-media-comms-e1416852285870.png" attr="" comment="" date="1459651762" name="social-media-comms-e1416852285870.png" path="social-media-comms-e1416852285870.png" size="218490" stream="social-media-comms-e1416852285870.png" user="Main.CharlesRoper" version="1" |
|---|
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="05172b0bcc5f10528912f499bee51c1406a7ec-wm.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1459651776" name="05172b0bcc5f10528912f499bee51c1406a7ec-wm.jpg" path="05172b0bcc5f10528912f499bee51c1406a7ec-wm.jpg" size="84564" stream="05172b0bcc5f10528912f499bee51c1406a7ec-wm.jpg" user="Main.CharlesRoper" version="1" |
|---|
|
|
|
CharlesRoperSecondEssay 3 - 03 Apr 2016 - Main.CharlesRoper
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted. | |
<
< | Paper Title | >
> | Does The Internet Make People More or Less Sociable? | | | -- By CharlesRoper - 30 Mar 2016 |
|
|
CharlesRoperSecondEssay 2 - 02 Apr 2016 - Main.CharlesRoper
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted. | | |
| |
>
> |
See my page for more of my work
| | | You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines: |
|
|
CharlesRoperSecondEssay 1 - 30 Mar 2016 - Main.CharlesRoper
|
|
>
> |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
Paper Title
-- By CharlesRoper - 30 Mar 2016
Section I
Subsection A
Subsub 1
Subsection B
Subsub 1
Subsub 2
Section II
Subsection A
Subsection B
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list. |
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|