Law in Contemporary Society

View   r3  >  r2  ...
ConradCoutinhoSecondPaper 3 - 11 May 2010 - Main.FarayiMafoti
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="SecondPaper"

It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.

Line: 59 to 59
 The Lochner line, conceptualized in this way, has not been completely overturned. For example, in Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976) , where the Court ruled that spending money to influence elections is protected free speech, the Court ruled that the government could not take significant action to change the the "neutral state"--the distribution of resources which gave rise to differential ability to "speak."
Added:
>
>		**Conrad, I apologize for the delay.

My thoughts:

1. Possibly too much exposition. The only paragraph that really contains your reflections is the second to last (but even then, these arguments are par for the course for anyone with revisionist leanings). There was no need to elucidate the facts or the holding to the degree that you did because Lochner is so firmly embedded in American constitutional consciousness.

2. *

 
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.

Revision 3r3 - 11 May 2010 - 21:25:45 - FarayiMafoti
Revision 2r2 - 17 Apr 2010 - 08:12:11 - ConradCoutinho
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM