Law in Contemporary Society

View   r14  >  r13  ...
DutyandResponsibility 14 - 24 Jan 2008 - Main.AndrewGradman
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
I'm actually really glad no one used the words "duty" or "responsibility" in their introductory statements. I don't believe in the concept of altruism. No one does anything from which they don't benefit and I'm glad that no one decided to declare him or herself a martyr for society. If being self-sacrificing makes you feel good, then you are benefiting from your "altruistic" act. One should commit his or her life to something they love, something that brings joy. Doing something out of guilt (which is how I see "duty") will not bring you joy or self-satisfaction in life and ultimately, you can't be truly committed or good at something you do with a groan. -- KateVershov - 24 Jan 2008
Line: 17 to 17
 I believe in altruism, but I'm with Kate in that I won't fault someone who won't declare it as their "duty" or "responsibility". Someone who says "I want to do good" is the functional equivalent of one who says "I feel a duty/responsibility to do good." If we'll be happier, and more driven, and more committed to do good, when we "want" to rather than when society imposes it as a "duty," then by all means say it like that. By shifting the rhetoric from society to the individual, America educates us to be self-sustaining in our do-goodery.
Changed:
<
<		Risk is a question for another post.
>
>		None of us said "risk" in our Intros, but we all took a risk when we exposed our life's goals to our classmates.
 -- AndrewGradman - 24 Jan 2008

Revision 14r14 - 24 Jan 2008 - 20:22:55 - AndrewGradman
Revision 13r13 - 24 Jan 2008 - 18:50:17 - AndrewHerink
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM