| |
ElyseSchneiderThirdPaper 4 - 06 Aug 2009 - Main.EbenMoglen
|
|
META TOPICPARENT | name="ThirdPaper" |
| | Law School is not the only party to blame. It is up to us as law students to demand that we be taught in a way that is hands-on, that makes us aware of the issues facing our legal system, and that prepares us to be a generation of change. | |
< < |
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" on the next line:
# * Set ALLOWTOPICVIEW = TWikiAdminGroup, ElyseSchneider
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of that line. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated list
Center text
| > > |
- Here as in the other two essays, you are asking for realist conclusions but basing the rhetoric on non-realist arguments. You think that if law school were different now (or even that if law school had been different forty years ago) politicians primarily sensitive to the demands of voters who haven't been to law school, and police who haven't been to law school, and prosecutors and judges who see the system everyday and know exactly how it works, and contractors and unions who benefit from the trillions of dollars we have spent on confinement would all have agreed not to encarcerate more people? Or that the legislators in statehouses would have stood shoulder to shoulder and prevented it while constantly being challenged by people who wanted their jobs and were willing to pander to the voters' greed for punishment of other peoples' wayward children? And realists are supposed to agree with you about that?
- What the essay wants is for people to pay attention to the realities of criminal justice, and in particular for law students to visit jails. This seems to me like a fine idea, and maybe even something to make an essay out of. But beginning by assuming the responsibility of proving that our present mess results in significant part from law students' not visiting enough jails is an unnecessary burden, it seems to me. It's always a good idea to protest the unreality of our public dialog about criminal justice, but it's also necessary to keep firmly in mind, as your first essay was designed to explore, just how deep the constituency for unrealism is.
| | \ No newline at end of file |
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|
| |