Law in Contemporary Society

View   r6  >  r5  ...
ExamsAndImprovingLawSchool 6 - 22 May 2008 - Main.AndrewWolstan
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
I asked this question early on in the course, and I didn't receive much feedback. I'll try again. Do you think that if we had more methods of evaluation in a course beyond the one final exam that it would improve the first year experience?
Line: 42 to 42
 Professor Greenberg gave two graded mid-terms in Civ. Pro. Although it played havoc with other classes and it was easy to see why mid-term assignments are discouraged in law school, talking with him after the first (poor) exam result helped my exam writing considerably.

-- DanielHarris - 21 May 2008

Added:
>
>

I think a lot of the comments are focused around helping to understand how to write an exam. I think that problem could be fixed if a professor simply said how they wanted their exam answers given. What do you think of the other effects on the course structure and atmosphere. For those that had midterms, did the class have more cooperation? What about less black letter questions?

-- AndrewWolstan - 22 May 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

Revision 6r6 - 22 May 2008 - 06:18:17 - AndrewWolstan
Revision 5r5 - 21 May 2008 - 16:11:45 - DanielHarris
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM