Law in Contemporary Society

View   r5  >  r4  ...
FranciscoGuzmanSecondPaper 5 - 21 Apr 2010 - Main.JessicaCohen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="SecondPaper"
Line: 42 to 42
 Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of that line. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated list
Changed:
<
<		Hi Francisco,
>
>		Hi Francisco,
 Just a few things I'm thinking about after the first few reads of your paper. I don't know much about securities law but did do some reading about it...anyway, first, you say that securities law is attempting to achieve the unachievable in prohibiting insider trading. On a general note, the government tries to work towards many ideals we don't think are perfectly achievable in practice (I'm thinking about equal opportunities in society for people of all races, or equal access to public school education, for example). Second, what are exactly you trying to argue here? That insider trading should no longer be prohibited? Or that the Supreme Court's opinions have simply been contradictory? (That said, I think you can make the case that insider trading should be abolished if you want to.)

Revision 5r5 - 21 Apr 2010 - 12:48:47 - JessicaCohen
Revision 4r4 - 21 Apr 2010 - 03:20:17 - JessicaCohen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM