| |
LawSchoolAdvice 14 - 24 Feb 2010 - Main.JenniferGreen
|
| Before coming to law school, I received two pieces of advice from coworkers about how to "succeed" at Columbia Law School. I found both of these to be really troubling and upsetting. I also think that they demonstrate attitudes that are indicative of some of the problems with the current law school set up and the reasons that people feel the need/desire to pawn their degrees. I figured this would be a good place to discuss them, hear what other people think about them and hear advice that others received before coming to law school.
The first piece of advice that I got was to go into each of my first year classes on the first day with one thing in mind - the exam. All of my work should be geared to "acing" the exam. I should read prior exams/outlines before coming to class to get an idea of what the professor covered on exams (black letter law, policy, etc.) and focus only on learning these things. | | Overall, however, you do make a good point – working hard is a good factor. I appreciate your comments on the thread!
-- DavidGoldin - 21 Feb 2010 | |
> > |
This is a very interesting thread and I have enjoyed reading your original post, David, as well as the comments. Like virtually everyone who has posted on this thread, I received precisely the same advice. I initially found the prospect of grades as an indicator of anything that truly mattered about me absolutely absurd. After all, I think I’m a pretty interesting person with good judgment. Why on earth should my potential worth to an employer turn on something so arbitrary? This is all the more ironic given my background. I went to a predominantly Black high school in Louisville, KY, the alma mater of “The Greatest” Muhammad Ali. I graduated first in my class, expending only a fraction of the effort that academic “success” in college and law school demands. Back then, my ever-wise mother’s advice was: “You must demonstrate your intelligence in your interactions with people. Most people don’t know and, in fact, don’t care what grades are on your transcript.” This conventional wisdom is turned on its head in the law school setting. It is easy to bash law firms as being grade and “prestige whores”, but the phenomenon of grades as a gatekeeper, or proxy for intelligence and work ethic, applies to many public interest organizations with equal force.
There are a few among us who, for various reasons (scholarships, trust funds, etc.), are not making a financial sacrifice by being here. For others, like me, law school and, specifically, Columbia Law School, was a calculated investment. After all, if I did not believe in the power of the return afforded by the Columbia brand, I could have attended my local law school for free. Given that in the present system – for better or worse – grades are our currency, it would be counterintuitive to not fight to the death to maximize the return on this enormous investment. Many of us want to be world changers and, at the very least, a positive force in our communities. If you’re like me, and probably can’t sneak into your desired destination through a side window (i.e. you don’t have “friends in high places”), you’re left playing the game by the present rules.
But, all is not lost. In many institutions and systems that have eventually been dismantled, there was someone who mastered the rules, out-smarted the game, and ended up wielding the power. In this sense, forward-thinking and reform-minded people – not unlike those who advocate grade reform at CLS – have value in every domain.
-- JenniferGreen - 24 Feb 2010 | | |
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|
| |