Law in Contemporary Society

View   r4  >  r3  >  r2  >  r1
MakalikaNaholowaa-SecondPaper 4 - 13 Apr 2008 - Main.MakalikaNaholowaa
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
Line: 23 to 23
  The hanai practice described above survives today. But the reality of customs continued from ancient Maoli traditions is that their development occurred during a time when the Maoli were a racially homogeneous community. Descriptions of how hanai children were recognized, as full members of the family without lessened community recognition, come from a time when recognition questions involving trans-racial hanai did not arise. Thus, no custom squarely addresses how the general Hawaiian community has or should recognize a racially non-Hawaiian child that is hanai into a racially Hawaiian family.

Changed:
<
<
The face of the Hawaiian community has changed dramatically in the last century. Hawaiians are continuing the tradition of hanai, but in the highly racially-mixed communities and hanai family members now include racially-non-Hawaiian (RNH) persons and their descendants.
>
>
The face of the Hawaiian community has changed dramatically in the last century. Hawaiians are continuing the tradition of hanai, but in highly racially-mixed communities and hanai family members now include racially-non-Hawaiian (RNH) persons and their descendants.
 

A. Modern Challenge: The Trans-racial Hanai Family

Line: 35 to 35
 

B. Effect: Three Nested Rings of Harm

Changed:
<
<
These exclusionary RNH- hanai practices are causing harm on three fronts. First, the hanai person suffers by not being granted the same rights to participation in the community that his hanai family members would by virtue of his hanai status – a status that has deliberately avoided diminished recognition within the family or community. Second, it is important to realize that the Hawaiian family as a whole is associatively injured. The ohana concept does not allow assault – physically, socially, politically – on a member to remain localized. The community that calls into question the legitimacy of a hanai child harms not just the child but insults the entire family unit. Third, the Hawaiian community as a whole is harmed. The community is allowing race to nullify the opportunity for meaningful community contribution by a child of a community family. The community is also creating unnecessary exceptions to recognition traditions of Hawaiian family members and treatment of hanai persons which degrades the culture that the policy aims to preserve.
>
>
These exclusionary RNH- hanai practices are causing harm on three fronts. First, the hanai person suffers by not being granted the same rights to participation in the community that his hanai family members would by virtue of his hanai status – a status that traditionally has deliberately avoided diminished recognition within the family or community. Second, it is important to realize that the Hawaiian family as a whole is associatively injured. The ohana concept does not allow assault – physically, socially, politically – on a member to remain localized. The community that calls into question the legitimacy of a hanai child harms not just the child but insults and causes emotional harm to the entire family unit. Third, the Hawaiian community as a whole is harmed. The community is allowing race to nullify the opportunity for meaningful community contribution by a child of a community family. The community is also creating unnecessary exceptions to recognition traditions of Hawaiian family members and treatment of hanai persons which degrades the culture that the policy aims to preserve.
 

III. A Call for Change: Cultural Preservation Policies that Maintain Substantive Cultural Values

Changed:
<
<
The harm that these exclusionary policies cause is so pervasive within the Hawaiian community that they must be changed. Community leaders must look to traditional Maoli goals of customs and practices to inform the development of new policies for RNH-hanai family members. As the Hawaiian community strives to prevent cultural extinction it must take care not to subverting major customs such as the recognition for ohana members in a community and the status of hanai members in an ohana. These cultural cornerstones should not be overturned. Efforts to preserve these values, to reaffirm the importance of recognition of our hanai family, whatever their biological race, would have the effect of correcting the discordance between cultural values and modern recognition rules while also preventing the multifarious harms described above.
>
>
The harm that these exclusionary policies cause is so pervasive within the Hawaiian community that they must be changed. Community leaders must look to traditional Maoli goals of customs and practices to inform the development of new policies for RNH-hanai family members. As the Hawaiian community strives to prevent cultural extinction it must take care not to subvert major customs such as the recognition for ohana members in a community and the status of hanai members in an ohana. These cultural cornerstones should not be disregarded. Efforts to preserve these values, to reaffirm the importance of recognition of our hanai family, whatever their biological race, would have the effect of correcting the discordance between cultural values and modern recognition rules while also preventing the multifarious harms described above.
 
Line: 58 to 58
 
Changed:
<
<

Appendix II: Illustration of NRH-Hanai Exclusion

>
>

Appendix II: Illustration of RNH-Hanai Exclusion

 
Changed:
<
<
Mohica-Cummings v. Kamehameha School illustrates this problem well. Kamehameha School is a prestigious K-12 private school providing services that include difficult to obtain Hawaiian cultural and language education courses. Their admission’s policy is racially preferential and it is effectively completely exclusive to persons with a Hawaiian ancestor. There is no language in their policy speaking to RNH-hanai children and the current interpretation denies admissions preference to this group. Braydon Mohica-Cummings is the son of a RNH-hanai woman. He was admitted to Kamehameha School, but his admission to the school was rescinded when it was discovered that his Hawaiian familial status was through his hanai grandfather, a Native Hawaiian man. After a court provided injunctory relief allowing Braydon to attend school while the suit challenging the lawfulness of Kamehameha’s racially preferential policies was in progress, the school settled the case with the family. The settlement included an agreement to allow Braydon an exception to their ancestor requirement, but no general exception for NRH-hanai persons has been instituted.
>
>
Mohica-Cummings v. Kamehameha School illustrates this problem well. Kamehameha School is a prestigious K-12 private school providing services that include difficult to obtain Hawaiian cultural and language education courses. Their admission’s policy is racially preferential and it is effectively completely exclusive to persons with a Hawaiian ancestor. There is no language in their policy speaking to RNH-hanai children and the current interpretation denies admissions preference to this group. Braydon Mohica-Cummings is the son of a RNH-hanai woman. He was admitted to Kamehameha School, but his admission to the school was rescinded when it was discovered that his Hawaiian familial status was through his hanai grandfather, a Native Hawaiian man. After a court provided injunctory relief allowing Braydon to attend school while the suit challenging the lawfulness of Kamehameha’s racially preferential policies was in progress, the school settled the case with the family. The settlement included an agreement to allow Braydon an exception to their ancestor requirement, but no general exception for RNH-hanai persons has been instituted.
 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

MakalikaNaholowaa-SecondPaper 3 - 05 Apr 2008 - Main.MakalikaNaholowaa
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
Line: 8 to 8
 

Policing the Borders of Racially Exclusive Policies within the Kanaka Maoli Community:
The Recognition of Racially Non-Hawaiian Hanai Persons in Hawaiian Families

Changed:
<
<
The indigenous people of Hawai’i, the Kanaka Maoli, have traditions for handling adoption called hanai. Hanai practices are not unique compared to other Polynesian peoples, but they significantly differ from traditional adoption practices in other parts of the United States. This paper will explain what those differences are in order to explore (i) how the substance of the hanai practice is being betrayed in within the modern Hawaiian community, (ii) what harmful effects this betrayal has for the family concerned and the group as a whole, and (iii) how these harms should be corrected by addressing the discordance between current community recognition policies and traditional cultural values concerning family and hanai family members.
>
>
The indigenous people of Hawai’i, the Kanaka Maoli, have traditions for handling adoption called hanai. Hanai practices are not unique compared to other Polynesian peoples, but they significantly differ from traditional adoption practices in other parts of the United States. This paper looks at what those differences are in order to explore (i) how the substance of the hanai practice is being betrayed within the modern Hawaiian community, (ii) what harmful effects this betrayal has for the family concerned and the group as a whole, and (iii) how these harms should be corrected by addressing the discordance between current community recognition policies and traditional cultural values concerning family and hanai family members.
 

I. The Spirit of Hanai, and the Difference Between “Hanai” & “Adoption”

Changed:
<
<
The common conception of a family entity in the United States is the nuclear family, and the term adoption refers to the movement from a child permanently and completely from its natural nuclear family to the adoptive one. The traditional Maoli people lived communally and their conceptions of family and adoption differs. A person’s family, their ohana, goes beyond the parent-child relationship to include what Americans would consider far distant relatives (i.e. 13th or 14th cousins) and close friends in the community. Hanai describes the permanent movement of a child’s primary care giving from the natural parents to someone usually within their ohana, although not necessarily a biological relative. The hanai child is always aware of its natural parentage and will likely have a relationship with the natural parents. However the hanai relationship between child and adoptive parents is equal in recognition and similar in substance to that of the adoptive parent’s natural children.
>
>
The common conception of a family entity in the United States is the nuclear family, and the term adoption refers to the movement from a child permanently and completely from its natural nuclear family to the adoptive one. Traditionally Maoli people lived communally and their conception of family and adoption differed. A person’s family, their ohana, goes beyond the parent-child relationship to include what most Americans would consider far distant relatives (i.e. 13th or 14th cousins) and close friends in the community. Hanai describes the permanent movement of a child’s primary care giving from the natural parents to someone usually within their ohana, although not necessarily a biological relative. The hanai child is always aware of its natural parentage and will likely have a relationship with the natural parents. However the hanai relationship between child and adoptive parents is equal in recognition and substance to that of the adoptive parent’s natural children.
  Hanai is common and not considered emotionally traumatizing for a child. The hanai system and extended ohana structure create an environment in which a hanai child has the benefit of his hanai parents and natural parents, instead of a perception of loss expressed in western adoption practice. There is no stigma connected to being hanai within Maoli families. There is also no tradition of lessened recognition of a family member due to a hanai, versus a biological, connection. Hanai compared to natural children are equally loved, committed to permanently for care giving, and recognized as heirs.

Line: 21 to 21
 

II. The Spirit of Ohana & Hanai Betrayed

Changed:
<
<
The hanai practice described above still survives. But the reality of customs from ancient Maoli traditions is that their development occurred during a time when the Maoli were a racially homogeneous community. Descriptions of how hanai children were recognized, as full members of the family without lessened community recognition, come from a time when recognition questions involving trans-racial hanai did not notably arise. Thus, no custom squarely addresses how the general Hawaiian community has or should recognize a racially non-Hawaiian child that is hanai into a racially Hawaiian family.
>
>
The hanai practice described above survives today. But the reality of customs continued from ancient Maoli traditions is that their development occurred during a time when the Maoli were a racially homogeneous community. Descriptions of how hanai children were recognized, as full members of the family without lessened community recognition, come from a time when recognition questions involving trans-racial hanai did not arise. Thus, no custom squarely addresses how the general Hawaiian community has or should recognize a racially non-Hawaiian child that is hanai into a racially Hawaiian family.
  The face of the Hawaiian community has changed dramatically in the last century. Hawaiians are continuing the tradition of hanai, but in the highly racially-mixed communities and hanai family members now include racially-non-Hawaiian (RNH) persons and their descendants.
Line: 41 to 41
 

III. A Call for Change: Cultural Preservation Policies that Maintain Substantive Cultural Values

Changed:
<
<
The harm that these exclusionary policies cause is so pervasive within the Hawaiian community that they must be changed. Community leaders must look to traditional Maoli goals of customs and practices to inform the development of new policies that strive for cultural preservation without substantively subverting major customs such as the recognition for ohana members in a community and the status of hanai members in an ohana. These cultural cornerstones should not be overturned. Policy makers must look to these values and allow them to inform rules pertaining to recognition of community members. Efforts like these would point to the importance of recognition of our hanai family, without regard to their biological race, and would have the effect of correcting the discordance between cultural values and modern recognition rules while also preventing the multifarious harms described above.
>
>
The harm that these exclusionary policies cause is so pervasive within the Hawaiian community that they must be changed. Community leaders must look to traditional Maoli goals of customs and practices to inform the development of new policies for RNH-hanai family members. As the Hawaiian community strives to prevent cultural extinction it must take care not to subverting major customs such as the recognition for ohana members in a community and the status of hanai members in an ohana. These cultural cornerstones should not be overturned. Efforts to preserve these values, to reaffirm the importance of recognition of our hanai family, whatever their biological race, would have the effect of correcting the discordance between cultural values and modern recognition rules while also preventing the multifarious harms described above.
 





Changed:
<
<

Appendix I: English to Hawaiian Dictionary

>
>

Appendix I: English to Hawaiian Glossary

 

Kanaka Maoli, Maoli: Native Hawaiians (pronounced similarly as the Maori, the related indigenous peoples of New Zealand)


MakalikaNaholowaa-SecondPaper 2 - 04 Apr 2008 - Main.MakalikaNaholowaa
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 -- MakalikaNaholowaa - 01 Apr 2008
Changed:
<
<
---+ Discordance in Native Hawaiian Law:  Recognition of Adopted Children

>
>
DRAFT READY FOR REVIEW

Policing the Borders of Racially Exclusive Policies within the Kanaka Maoli Community:
The Recognition of Racially Non-Hawaiian Hanai Persons in Hawaiian Families

 
Deleted:
<
<
A Definition of Hanai: Hanai is the kanaka maoli word for adoption. Under traditional hanai practices: Ω No stigma attached to being adopted/hanai, no sense of inferior position within family due to hanai under this system Ω Normally conducted within the family, but if that was not possible then with some other family in the community. Ω Differs from American adoption in that surviving biological children were still granted access to their hanai child and the hanai child was always aware of his biological birth roots. Ω However, Children recognized as a part of the ohana they were hanai into, hanai family took full and permanent responsibility for their care. Ω Also noteworthy: Hawaiian families lived communally and with extended members - the responsibility of a hanai child, like natural born children, was not only an undertaking by the parents primarily providing their care, but they are recognized as a member of the larger extended ohana and accepted by this wider community.

B Issue: The hanai tradition survives from Ancient Hawaiian tradition and was developed during a time when the Maoli were a racially homogenous community. References to how hanai children were recognized (as full members of the family without lessened community recognition) take place at a time when recognition questions involving transracial hanai did not significantly arise. Result is that although we know the spirit of hanai to be one of full inclusion of our hanai keiki into the ohana, no record squarely addresses how a racially non-Hawaiian child adopted into a racially Hawaiian family should be recognized by the general Native Hawaiian community. However the question has come up in modern times due to the rise in transracial adoption, and various Native Hawaiian organizations have decided to deny recognition, taking up a policy of strict exclusion without blood quantum. By analyzing the results of the current policy by significant Maoli organizations, its my opinion that Ω 1. the decision not to recognize racially non-Hawaiian (RNH) hanai persons as full members of the Maoli community is wrong in light of the spirit of hawaiian hanai custom and traditional Maoli ohana values. Ω 2. And, the policy as it stands is so damaging to the individual RNH-hanai person, hanai ohana, and Maoli community as a whole that it can not stand and must be changed to allow for full participation in the community, and potentially in the self governing political body, of Maoli people to the same extent that their natural born brothers and sisters would.

C Problem Statement: something that was not faced by traditional hanai parents , but a reality today in light of the significant upset of Native Hawaiian life over the last 100 years, is: Ω 1. the Native Hawaiian community is responding to the need for cultural self preservation by creating and maintaining programs and organizations for its own benefit ≈ Kamehameha School: a premier private K-12 school that provides not only standard education courses but education on native hawaiian language and culture. ≈ Kau Inoa: an organization that seeks to create an organization for Maoli self governance ≈ Various Halaus: social clubs usually named in honor of an ali'i Ω 2. these programs and organizations generally restrict participation to those with some Native Hawaiian blood quantum Ω 3. the hanai parents/family are able to participate in these programs Ω 4. the hanai keiki and his/her descendants are not granted entrance because no exception is made to recognize adopted persons similarly to natural born ohana members Ω 5. as a result hanai children and their descendants comprise a class of persons that are members of Native Hawaiian families per both Western conception (via adoption) and Native Hawaiian custom/tradition/law (via hanai) but not allowed participation in the Native Hawaiian community fully as natural born members could.

D Illustration of Problem: Monica-Cummings v. Kamehameha Schools Ω Brayton sought admission to Kamehameha Schools, a highly competitive private school that gives preferential admissions status to applicants with Native Hawaiian ancestry in order to meet the school's goals of preserving Native Hawaiian culture and being a resource to aid the Native Hawaiian people. Brayton is the son of a RNH hanai woman, raised and legally adopted by a Native Hawaiian father, and is therefore a member of a Native Hawaiian family. When the school realized that his Native Hawaiian family status was created by hanai, they upheld their plain meaning, literal interpretation of the criteria requiring ancestry and rescinded his admission to the school.

E What Harm Is Caused: This is a harm for Ω The hanai ohana that is injured by a community that will not give full recognition to the child Ω The hanai keiki that culturally identifies with the Maoli community but is not allowed to participate fully within it Ω The Maoli community as a whole is harmed because ≈ 1. the weakening of cultural values related to hanai and the ohana, such as the open and full acceptance of family members and encouragement of adoption, is a sign of cultural decline. It makes no sense to exclude people in an effort to preserve a culture when by virtue of excluding you undermine a cornerstone value of the culture. ≈ 2. the preservation of the culture is possible through participation by members nurtured by the community, who understand the values of the culture in a meaningful way that those foreign to the group can not. Alienating members with such cultural and familial ties is a loss of valuable membership for the community.

F Why This Is Wrong: Ω This effectively creates an inferior class of family members. To borrow a metaphor from property law, the NRH-hanai member has fewer sticks in his bundle when it comes to his right to participate in the Native Hawaiian community. He gets the right to the same upbringing as his racially Hawaiian brothers and sisters, but may not be admitted to the school his siblings attend. He may be taught to identify with Native Hawaiian values and way of life by his hanai family, but he may not participate in some Hawaiian organizations to help preserve his culture and the culture of his ohana. Ω Hawaiian Family Values oppose this concept of devaluing a family member due to hanai. As outlined above, hanai is encouraged in Hawaiian culture. It is a demonstration of the love and care that hawaiians have for their ohana and their extended community ohana to make sure that every child have a loving home. This tradition that encourages us to love and raise a child fully and permanently, as we would a natural born child, does not encourage us to exclude him later, treat him as a haole, an outsider. Ω It is understandable for Native Hawaiians, like any indigenous people struggling for cultural survival, to be weary of persons without racial links when considering admittance to programs or organizations designed to benefit only community members. Concerns over truly shared interests without a racial link to the group are common and arguably well grounded. But adopted persons are the exception to the rule. In Native Hawaiian families, to exclude these persons, to maintain vigilance against the threat of infiltration by foreigners, at the expense of sacrificing valued hanai family members in discordance with traditional Hawaiian family values is wrong, harmful, and should not continue.

G Why This Is A Legal Problem: Since the demise of the Kingdom of Hawaii, Native Hawaiians have no self governance structure, and therefore the question of how to treat RNH-hanai is not technically a legal question but one being answered in the context of private organizations aligned with the interest of a racial people. However, there are multiple organizations within the Native Hawaiian community working to achieve self governance (again reference Kau Inoa). Should that goal be reached (and lets assume that that is possible within my lifetime), Native Hawaiians will presumably rebuild their legal system. Then the question of how to recognize NRH-hanai family members will become not only one of social science, but again an issue in Native Hawaiian law. At that time, it is likely that the interpretation of how to treat NRH persons under the hanai system used today will be adopted or at least heavily considered in deciding this question in a formal law-making context. Therefore it is imperative that this question be treated by the Native Hawaiian community today with rigorous attention to its support in Hawaiian tradition and with consideration to both public policy concerns and of the long term negative, prejudicial effects it will have on the Maoli families involved. By doing so, as discussed above, it is clear that NRH-Hanai persons should be granted the same recognition and rights of participation in the Native Hawaiian community as natural born Maoli people.

- 2 Hawaiian to English Dictionary A Kanaka Maoli, Maoli: Native Hawaiians (pronounced similarly as the Maori, the related indigenous peoples of New Zealand) B hanai: term referring to adoption. Examples: I am hanai. = I am adopted. / This is my hanai mother = This is my mother by adoption. C keiki: child. Example: She is my hanai keiki. = She is my adopted child. D ohana: family. E halau: school or group. Normally when someone says they are a part of a halau, they are referring either to a hula school or social club. F ali'i: royalty, descendents of Wakea, a diety of Ancient Hawaii. G haole: outsider, foreigner. Today most commonly used to refer to a white person.

- 3 Links to Sources A Explanation of what Hanai means: Ω www.uhh.hawaii.edu—writing.php <http://www.uhh.hawaii.edu/academics/hohonu/writing.php?id=28>

 
Added:
>
>
The indigenous people of Hawai’i, the Kanaka Maoli, have traditions for handling adoption called hanai. Hanai practices are not unique compared to other Polynesian peoples, but they significantly differ from traditional adoption practices in other parts of the United States. This paper will explain what those differences are in order to explore (i) how the substance of the hanai practice is being betrayed in within the modern Hawaiian community, (ii) what harmful effects this betrayal has for the family concerned and the group as a whole, and (iii) how these harms should be corrected by addressing the discordance between current community recognition policies and traditional cultural values concerning family and hanai family members.
 
Added:
>
>

I. The Spirit of Hanai, and the Difference Between “Hanai” & “Adoption”

 
Deleted:
<
<
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
 \ No newline at end of file
Added:
>
>
The common conception of a family entity in the United States is the nuclear family, and the term adoption refers to the movement from a child permanently and completely from its natural nuclear family to the adoptive one. The traditional Maoli people lived communally and their conceptions of family and adoption differs. A person’s family, their ohana, goes beyond the parent-child relationship to include what Americans would consider far distant relatives (i.e. 13th or 14th cousins) and close friends in the community. Hanai describes the permanent movement of a child’s primary care giving from the natural parents to someone usually within their ohana, although not necessarily a biological relative. The hanai child is always aware of its natural parentage and will likely have a relationship with the natural parents. However the hanai relationship between child and adoptive parents is equal in recognition and similar in substance to that of the adoptive parent’s natural children.

Hanai is common and not considered emotionally traumatizing for a child. The hanai system and extended ohana structure create an environment in which a hanai child has the benefit of his hanai parents and natural parents, instead of a perception of loss expressed in western adoption practice. There is no stigma connected to being hanai within Maoli families. There is also no tradition of lessened recognition of a family member due to a hanai, versus a biological, connection. Hanai compared to natural children are equally loved, committed to permanently for care giving, and recognized as heirs.

II. The Spirit of Ohana & Hanai Betrayed

The hanai practice described above still survives. But the reality of customs from ancient Maoli traditions is that their development occurred during a time when the Maoli were a racially homogeneous community. Descriptions of how hanai children were recognized, as full members of the family without lessened community recognition, come from a time when recognition questions involving trans-racial hanai did not notably arise. Thus, no custom squarely addresses how the general Hawaiian community has or should recognize a racially non-Hawaiian child that is hanai into a racially Hawaiian family.

The face of the Hawaiian community has changed dramatically in the last century. Hawaiians are continuing the tradition of hanai, but in the highly racially-mixed communities and hanai family members now include racially-non-Hawaiian (RNH) persons and their descendants.

A. Modern Challenge: The Trans-racial Hanai Family

The formal community recognition problem that trans-racial hanai presents occurs in the following context. The Hawaiian community is responding to the need for active efforts at cultural preservation by creating programs and organizations for its own benefit. These programs and organizations generally restrict participation to those with some Hawaiian blood quantum. Generally these policies provide no language regarding the treatment of RNH-_hanai_ family members. As a result, the adopting ohana members are able to participate in these programs, but the RNH- hanai member and his descendants are excluded. Therefore, RNH- hanai children and their descendants comprise a class of persons that are members of Hawaiian families but not allowed participation in the Hawaiian community fully compared to natural born members. (See Appendix II for an illustration of this problem recently presented in litigation.)

B. Effect: Three Nested Rings of Harm

These exclusionary RNH- hanai practices are causing harm on three fronts. First, the hanai person suffers by not being granted the same rights to participation in the community that his hanai family members would by virtue of his hanai status – a status that has deliberately avoided diminished recognition within the family or community. Second, it is important to realize that the Hawaiian family as a whole is associatively injured. The ohana concept does not allow assault – physically, socially, politically – on a member to remain localized. The community that calls into question the legitimacy of a hanai child harms not just the child but insults the entire family unit. Third, the Hawaiian community as a whole is harmed. The community is allowing race to nullify the opportunity for meaningful community contribution by a child of a community family. The community is also creating unnecessary exceptions to recognition traditions of Hawaiian family members and treatment of hanai persons which degrades the culture that the policy aims to preserve.

III. A Call for Change: Cultural Preservation Policies that Maintain Substantive Cultural Values

The harm that these exclusionary policies cause is so pervasive within the Hawaiian community that they must be changed. Community leaders must look to traditional Maoli goals of customs and practices to inform the development of new policies that strive for cultural preservation without substantively subverting major customs such as the recognition for ohana members in a community and the status of hanai members in an ohana. These cultural cornerstones should not be overturned. Policy makers must look to these values and allow them to inform rules pertaining to recognition of community members. Efforts like these would point to the importance of recognition of our hanai family, without regard to their biological race, and would have the effect of correcting the discordance between cultural values and modern recognition rules while also preventing the multifarious harms described above.





Appendix I: English to Hawaiian Dictionary

Kanaka Maoli, Maoli: Native Hawaiians (pronounced similarly as the Maori, the related indigenous peoples of New Zealand)

hanai: term referring to adoption. Examples: I am hanai. = I am adopted. / This is my hanai mother = This is my mother by adoption.

ohana: family, for Hawaiians normally more expansive scope than in Anglo culture, goes beyond immediate family to include all extended relatives.

Appendix II: Illustration of NRH-Hanai Exclusion

Mohica-Cummings v. Kamehameha School illustrates this problem well. Kamehameha School is a prestigious K-12 private school providing services that include difficult to obtain Hawaiian cultural and language education courses. Their admission’s policy is racially preferential and it is effectively completely exclusive to persons with a Hawaiian ancestor. There is no language in their policy speaking to RNH-hanai children and the current interpretation denies admissions preference to this group. Braydon Mohica-Cummings is the son of a RNH-hanai woman. He was admitted to Kamehameha School, but his admission to the school was rescinded when it was discovered that his Hawaiian familial status was through his hanai grandfather, a Native Hawaiian man. After a court provided injunctory relief allowing Braydon to attend school while the suit challenging the lawfulness of Kamehameha’s racially preferential policies was in progress, the school settled the case with the family. The settlement included an agreement to allow Braydon an exception to their ancestor requirement, but no general exception for NRH-hanai persons has been instituted.

 
<--/commentPlugin-->

MakalikaNaholowaa-SecondPaper 1 - 01 Apr 2008 - Main.MakalikaNaholowaa
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"

-- MakalikaNaholowaa - 01 Apr 2008

---+ Discordance in Native Hawaiian Law:  Recognition of Adopted Children

    A Definition of Hanai: Hanai is the kanaka maoli word for
      adoption.  Under traditional hanai practices: 
        Ω No stigma attached to being adopted/hanai, no sense of
          inferior position within family due to hanai under this system
        Ω Normally conducted within the family, but if that was not
          possible then with some other family in the community. 
        Ω Differs from American adoption in that surviving biological
          children were still granted access to their hanai child and
          the hanai child was always aware of his biological birth
          roots.  
        Ω However, Children recognized as a part of the ohana they were
          hanai into, hanai family took full and permanent
          responsibility for their care.
        Ω Also noteworthy:  Hawaiian families lived communally and with
          extended members - the responsibility of a hanai child, like
          natural born children, was not only an undertaking by the
          parents primarily providing their care, but they are
          recognized as a member of the larger extended ohana and
          accepted by this wider community.  

      B Issue: The hanai tradition survives from Ancient Hawaiian
      tradition and was developed during a time when the Maoli were a
      racially homogenous community.  References to how hanai children
      were recognized (as full members of the family without lessened
      community recognition)  take place at a time when recognition
      questions involving transracial hanai did not significantly
      arise.   Result is that although we know the spirit of hanai to
      be one of full inclusion of our hanai keiki into the ohana, no
      record squarely addresses how a racially non-Hawaiian child
      adopted into a racially Hawaiian family should be recognized by
      the general Native Hawaiian community.   However the question has
      come up in modern times due to the rise in transracial adoption,
      and various Native Hawaiian organizations have decided to deny
      recognition, taking up a policy of strict exclusion without blood
      quantum.   By analyzing the results of the current policy by
      significant Maoli organizations, its my opinion that
        Ω 1. the decision not to recognize racially non-Hawaiian (RNH) 
          hanai persons as full members of the Maoli community is wrong
          in light of the spirit of hawaiian hanai custom and
          traditional Maoli ohana values.  
        Ω 2. And, the policy as it stands is so damaging to the
          individual RNH-hanai person, hanai ohana, and Maoli community
          as a whole that it can not stand and must be changed to allow
          for full participation in the community, and potentially in
          the self governing political body, of Maoli people to the
          same extent that their natural born brothers and sisters
          would.   

     C Problem Statement:  something that was not faced by traditional
      hanai parents , but a reality today in light of the significant
      upset of Native Hawaiian life over the last 100 years, is: 
        Ω 1. the Native Hawaiian community is responding to the need
          for cultural self preservation by creating and maintaining
          programs and organizations for its own benefit
            ≈ Kamehameha School: a premier private K-12 school that
              provides not only standard education courses but
              education on native hawaiian language and culture.  
            ≈ Kau Inoa: an organization that seeks to create an
              organization for Maoli self governance
            ≈ Various Halaus: social clubs usually named in honor of an
              ali'i 
        Ω 2. these programs and organizations generally restrict
          participation to those with some Native Hawaiian blood
          quantum 
        Ω 3. the hanai parents/family are able to participate in these
          programs
        Ω 4. the hanai keiki and his/her descendants are not granted
          entrance because no exception is made to recognize adopted
          persons similarly to natural born ohana members
        Ω 5. as a result hanai children and their descendants comprise
          a class of persons that are members of Native Hawaiian
          families per both Western conception (via adoption) and
          Native Hawaiian custom/tradition/law (via hanai) but not
          allowed participation in the Native Hawaiian community fully
          as natural born members could.

    D Illustration of Problem:  Monica-Cummings v. Kamehameha Schools
        Ω Brayton sought admission to Kamehameha Schools, a highly
          competitive private school that gives preferential admissions
          status to applicants with Native Hawaiian ancestry in order
          to meet the school's goals of preserving Native Hawaiian
          culture and being a resource to aid the Native Hawaiian
          people.  Brayton is the son of a RNH hanai woman, raised and
          legally adopted by a Native Hawaiian father, and is therefore
          a member of a Native Hawaiian family.  When the school
          realized that his Native Hawaiian family status was created
          by hanai, they upheld their plain meaning, literal
          interpretation of the criteria requiring ancestry and
          rescinded his admission to the school.  

    E What Harm Is Caused: This is a harm for
        Ω The hanai ohana that is injured by a community that will not
          give full recognition to the child
        Ω The hanai keiki that culturally identifies with the Maoli
          community but is not allowed to participate fully within it
        Ω The Maoli community as a whole is harmed because
            ≈ 1. the weakening of cultural values related to hanai and
              the ohana, such as the open and full acceptance of family
              members and encouragement of adoption, is a sign of
              cultural decline.  It makes no sense to exclude people in
              an effort to preserve a culture when by virtue of
              excluding you undermine a cornerstone value of the
              culture.  
            ≈ 2. the preservation of the culture is possible through
              participation by members nurtured by the community, who
              understand the values of the culture in a meaningful way
              that those foreign to the group can not.  Alienating
              members with such cultural and familial ties is a loss of
              valuable membership for the community. 

     F Why This Is Wrong:
        Ω This effectively creates an inferior class of family members.
           To borrow a metaphor from property law, the NRH-hanai member
          has fewer sticks in his bundle when it comes to his right to
          participate in the Native Hawaiian community.  He gets the
          right to the same upbringing as his racially Hawaiian
          brothers and sisters, but may not be admitted to the school
          his siblings attend.  He may be taught to identify with
          Native Hawaiian values and way of life by his hanai family,
          but he may not participate in some Hawaiian organizations to
          help preserve his culture and the culture of his ohana. 
        Ω Hawaiian Family Values oppose this concept of devaluing a
          family member due to hanai.  As outlined above, hanai is
          encouraged in Hawaiian culture.  It is a demonstration of the
          love and care that hawaiians have for their ohana and their
          extended community ohana to make sure that every child have a
          loving home.  This tradition that encourages us to love and
          raise a child fully and permanently, as we would a natural
          born child, does not encourage us to exclude him later, treat
          him as a haole, an outsider. 
        Ω It is understandable for Native Hawaiians, like any
          indigenous people struggling for cultural survival, to be
          weary of persons without racial links when considering
          admittance to programs or organizations designed to benefit
          only community members.  Concerns over truly shared interests
          without a racial link to the group are common and arguably
          well grounded.  But adopted persons are the exception to the
          rule.  In Native Hawaiian families, to exclude these persons,
          to maintain vigilance against the threat of infiltration by
          foreigners, at the expense of sacrificing valued hanai family
          members in discordance with traditional Hawaiian family
          values is wrong, harmful, and should not continue.  

     G Why This Is A Legal Problem:  Since the demise of the Kingdom of
      Hawaii, Native Hawaiians have no self governance structure, and
      therefore the question of how to treat RNH-hanai is not
      technically a legal question but one being answered in the
      context of private organizations aligned with the interest of a
      racial people.  However, there are multiple organizations within
      the Native Hawaiian community working to achieve self governance
      (again reference Kau Inoa).  Should that goal be reached (and
      lets assume that that is possible within my lifetime), Native
      Hawaiians will presumably rebuild their legal system.  Then the
      question of how to recognize NRH-hanai family members will become
      not only one of social science, but again an issue in Native
      Hawaiian law.  At that time, it is likely that the interpretation
      of how to treat NRH persons under the hanai system used today
      will be adopted or at least heavily considered in deciding this
      question in a formal law-making context.   Therefore it is
      imperative that this question be treated by the Native Hawaiian
      community today with rigorous attention to its support in
      Hawaiian tradition and with consideration to both public policy
      concerns and of the long term negative, prejudicial effects it
      will have on the Maoli families involved.  By doing so, as
      discussed above, it is clear that NRH-Hanai persons should be
      granted the same recognition and rights of participation in the
      Native Hawaiian community as natural born Maoli people.  


- 2 Hawaiian  to English Dictionary
    A Kanaka Maoli, Maoli:   Native Hawaiians  (pronounced similarly as
      the Maori, the related indigenous peoples of New Zealand) 
    B hanai:  term referring to adoption.  Examples:  I am hanai. = I
      am adopted.  /  This is my hanai mother = This is my mother by
      adoption.   
    C keiki:  child.   Example: She is my hanai keiki.  = She is my
      adopted child.
    D ohana: family. 
    E halau: school or group. Normally when someone says they are a
      part of a halau, they are referring either to a hula school or
      social club. 
    F ali'i:  royalty, descendents of Wakea, a diety of Ancient Hawaii. 
    G haole:  outsider, foreigner.  Today most commonly used to refer
      to a white person.  


- 3 Links to Sources
    A Explanation of what Hanai means: 
        Ω www.uhh.hawaii.edu—writing.php
          



 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 4r4 - 13 Apr 2008 - 18:05:11 - MakalikaNaholowaa
Revision 3r3 - 05 Apr 2008 - 18:04:55 - MakalikaNaholowaa
Revision 2r2 - 04 Apr 2008 - 21:58:51 - MakalikaNaholowaa
Revision 1r1 - 01 Apr 2008 - 15:30:37 - MakalikaNaholowaa
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM