Law in Contemporary Society

View   r6  >  r5  ...
MarcLegrandSecondPaper 6 - 14 Jul 2012 - Main.MarcLegrand
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="SecondPaper"
Line: 31 to 31
 I’m not sure what we, as students, can do to change the system. As consumers of what is ultimately a $170,000 good, one would think we’d have some sway with the producers. At the same time, it often seems in law school that things are the way they are simply because that’s the way they were. In an institution that appears so resistant to change, it’s hard to see how the fundamental structure (3.5 months of lecture + 4 hours of exam) can be changed.
Changed:
<
<		There's an ongoing discussion at TimelySubmissionOfGrades that relates to some of these points and proposes potential steps in the right direction, as well.
>
>		There's an ongoing discussion at TimelySubmissionOfGrades that relates to some of these points as well. Even if the traditional final exam model of "evaluation" isn't going anywhere in the near future, it's valuable to consider alternatives. It can inspire suggestions for moderate reforms to nudge the system in the right direction, and it can help keep us grounded in the pre-EIP (and ongoing) torrents of grade-centrism.
 Hopefully it’s clear from my writing that I’d like to continue engaging on this topic, as well as on writing in general. \ No newline at end of file

Revision 6r6 - 14 Jul 2012 - 18:17:18 - MarcLegrand
Revision 5r5 - 11 Jul 2012 - 00:34:34 - MarcLegrand
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM