Law in Contemporary Society

View   r5  >  r4  ...
MatthewZornFirstPaper 5 - 23 Mar 2010 - Main.MatthewZorn
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Line: 29 to 29
 

Initial Takeaways

Changed:
<
<		First, mushiness in law is fine, if not desirable, so long as there are adequate procedures built into the system to hone and polish the law later. This process of error correction or "debugging" in the legal system will be expounded upon in my next essay.
>
>		First, mushiness in law is fine, if not desirable, so long as there are adequate procedures built into the system to hone and polish the law later. This process of error correction or "debugging" in the legal system will be expounded upon in another essay.
 Second, no system functions optimally on extreme principles. In the present metaphor, the best qualified robot was the robot that struck a balance between the formalistic extreme and the adaptive extreme. A similar argument against "extreme operation" can and will be made about other systems.

Revision 5r5 - 23 Mar 2010 - 06:13:37 - MatthewZorn
Revision 4r4 - 22 Mar 2010 - 20:40:12 - MatthewZorn
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM