| |
OurBrokenSystemofEducation 3 - 09 Mar 2009 - Main.MichaelDreibelbis
|
| I was struck by the part of Professor Moglen's lecture yesterday on our education system, and I wish to address some particularly troublesome thoughts that I've had regarding our higher education system (university level and beyond).
Prof. Moglen said that in general, professors don't care about their students very much. Instead of learning about their students, they would rather sit around in a faculty lunch and discuss how intelligent they are. While as an undergraduate, I had sinking suspicions of this sentiment, it was only until I worked as a graduate student TA that I realized the pervasiveness of this truth. I pursued a PhD? in engineering in part because of my love for teaching, and I was shocked to realize how few professors truly care about it. As a TA, I have worked for professors who rehash each year's lecture on dull powerpoint presentations despite repeated critical evaluations of their ineffectiveness, delegating almost all aspects of evaluation (including all test writing, grading, and office hours) to me and almost all aspects of actual learning to the student himself. In fact, while conversing with fellow graduate students, I have heard of certain professors openly declaring that they cared nothing about their undergraduates, that they were a pain in the ass, and that they would rather do research. And this was at a university which was consistently ranked in the top 5 in the nation and liked to boast of the success of their graduates in that particular field. | | This must be one of the goals of the wiki.
-- JosephLu - 08 Mar 2009 | |
> > | What is wrong with judging a university by the number of CEO's it produces? You both dismiss such a metric as mere prestige, but to me it seems at least as "real" as the more subjective measures of individual progress you would prefer. If I want to be a big-shot corporate lawyer, I would do well to attend Columbia. But if I want to be a law professor, maybe I'm better off at UChicago, despite its lower US News ranking. Alternatively, if getting an excellent educational experience is a priority, there are ways to find it.
If anything is broken, it is US News' ranking system in that it does not adequately reflect the faculty's teaching ability. But fortunately, we aren't forced into going where US News tells us to go. We just choose to follow their advice because we - not the law schools - value prestige over teaching quality. So I don't see any need for depression, Alex, because with at least fourteen "elite" law schools and plenty of information available on career opportunities, educational quality, quality of life, etc., it seems like it shouldn't be too hard for somebody to find the school that fits them best. That school may not always be the most prestigious, but if we choose prestige for its own sake, we have only ourselves to blame--not the law schools.
-- MichaelDreibelbis - 09 Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|
| |