Law in Contemporary Society

View   r17  >  r16  ...
OurOwnMyths 17 - 14 Feb 2009 - Main.MichaelHolloway
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="LawContempSoc"
I don't know what 'refactor' means, but since this has grown frustrating and confusing, I'm replacing the entire thread with a straightforward summary that does not resort to referencing Wikipedia, historical analogy, Poland in the 50s, Robspierre, or any other pretensions. I never meant to write anything complicated or argumentative.
Line: 53 to 53
 2) Andrew suggested that these notions form for each of us as reactions to the injustices prevailing in our particular time and place; their variety reflects the variety of our formative experiences. I think he's right.
Changed:
<
<		3) Andrew also suggested, on a related note, that the all political states depend at bottom on oppression, i.e., injustice. I pointed out that this is true of most non-state organizations as well.
>
>		3) Andrew also suggested, on a related note, that the all political states depend at bottom on oppression, i.e., injustice. I pointed out that this is true of many non-state organizations as well.
 
  • Suddenly everyone is an anarchist. This proposition is hardly self-evident.

Revision 17r17 - 14 Feb 2009 - 00:07:40 - MichaelHolloway
Revision 16r16 - 14 Feb 2009 - 00:06:17 - EbenMoglen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM