| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstPaper" |
|---|
|
|
<
< | |
| | |
|
<
< | It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
Paper Title
-- By PeterCavanaugh - 24 Feb 2010 |
>
> | Airline Policies Discriminating Due to Body Size Need Reform |
| | |
|
<
< | Section I |
>
> | A Brewing Storm
That air travel is degrading is something to which most people can relate, but an increasing number of americans are being exposed to a different indignity: restrictions on travel due to their size. The issue has been the subject of recent publicity when Southwest Airlines unseated director Kevin Smith on a full flight. However, some airlines have had policies addressing this issue for nearly thirty years. In this period there is no indication that there has been any progress or significant change in how these situations are handled, despite the fact that there is an increasing number of incidents and Americans are getting bigger.
Current Policies and Rationales |
| | |
|
<
< | Subsection A |
>
> | Policies
Most major carriers have a policy addressing this issue. Nearly all policies require larger passengers to purchase an extra seat in advance but will refund that ticket if the flight is not full. If the passenger has not purchased an extra seat and the flight is full, that passenger will not be allowed on that flight. The current policies leave complete discretion of enforcement to the gate and cabin crew which leads to inconsistency of enforcement. Additionally, problems are often not identified until the person is already seated, and frequently only at the prompting of the adjacent passenger.
Rationales
The most common reason cited for implementing these policies is for ensuring the comfort of all passengers on the flights. Some airlines also claim safety concerns and non-airline proponents also cite the cost of the added weight of larger passengers. The first two rationales are valid, while the third is not. |
| | |
|
>
> | First, the airlines argue that they are selling not just transportation but space. Single ticket passengers are only entitled to use the space bounded by their seat, and are entitled to the full use of that space without encroachment. The airlines argue that it is unfair to allow this encroachment into the space of another paying customer, especially when that encroachment interferes with the space and comfort of another passenger. |
| | |
|
<
< | Subsub 1 |
>
> | Second, the airlines contend that the policies are necessary so other passengers do not become trapped behind a larger passenger while evacuating a plane, and so the larger passenger himself has enough space to safely negotiate the space between rows and exit the plane quickly. It is unclear how true this is, or how much the purchasing of two seats affects this. |
| | |
|
<
< | Subsection B |
>
> | Finally, the argument about added cost because of added weight is not valid. While extra weight does cost extra fuel, the added cost generated by a larger person on a commercial airliner is negligible. |
| | |
|
<
< | Subsub 1 |
>
> | Effects of the Current System
When enforced, the current system does protect the interest of adjacent passengers, but it has ancillary effects of embarrassment, employment discrimination, and restrictions on ability to travel on travelers against whom it is enforced.
Being singled out for body size in a public place is an embarrassing experience and is made worse by the fact that a problem is not often identified until the passenger has been seated, at which point the only resolution is to remove the passenger from the plane.
The policy also can create employment discrimination. Many jobs require air travel. Since these passengers are required to buy an extra ticket, their travel costs are nearly double compared to other potential employees.
This policy also restricts the ability to travel freely. It makes last minute travel often impossible, especially during busy seasons and on busy days of the week such as Monday and Friday. Additionally, it makes travel contingent upon the actions of others. |
| | |
|
>
> | Proposed Alternatives
Make All Seats Bigger
Airlines could increase the size of all seats by a few inches. In addition to reducing or eliminating the need for a discriminatory policy, it would provide added comfort to other customers who feel restrained by current seats, but this would be difficult to implement. First, the majority of commercial airliners are a narrow-body design with only a single aisle. Increasing seat size in these planes would necessarily mean fewer seats, in some planes 33% fewer. Second, this would increase the cost of all airline tickets, harming those who do not require seats larger than are currently provided. Thirdly, it would significantly reduce passenger capacity of the the national fleet requiring more airplanes to maintain current transportation levels.
Make Some Seats Bigger
It is possible that airlines could increase the seat size of just a few seats on each plane, and price those seats in a way commensurate to their impact on the number of seats removed. Airlines have done similar things by adding a few rows with a extra leg room to accommodate taller passengers. This policy would likely be the most viable. The airlines say the current policies affect fewer than 1% of passengers, so a change that affects only a fraction of the seating may be sufficient. |
| | |
|
<
< | Subsub 2 |
>
> | Government Mandate
A final alternative is for the government to mandate that airlines cannot have such discriminatory policies. However, this policy would lead to unsatisfactory results for most parties. If airlines chose to install some bigger seats, they could not require larger passengers to sit in them. If they installed all larger seats, the same problems listed above would arise. And if they changed no seats, everyone would be unhappy. This solution would be imprecise and unpredictable. |
| | |
|
>
> | Call for Action
Whatever airlines decide to do, they must act. Not only is it important that airlines discontinue an embarrassing and ineffective policy, but they must act to accommodate the ever increasing size of americans. |
| | |
|
<
< | Section II
Subsection A
Subsection B |
>
> | -- By PeterCavanaugh - 24 Feb 2010 |
| |
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. |