| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted. |
| | -- By RafaelMiranda - 17 Apr 2024 |
|
<
< | As I conclude my second year of law school, there is one item that ought to be discussed with more disdain to the extent that it should frankly be removed as an option for the 1L Summer: the private sector 1L summer associate. |
>
> | As I conclude my second year of law school, there is one item that ought to be discussed with more disdain: the private sector 1L summer associate offerings. |
| | Background:
To preface, I worked at a law firm before I started law school for around 3.5 years. Graduating from UC Berkeley in 2019. The firm I worked at focused on complex commercial litigation and white-collar defense (interestingly it was founded by the former lead prosecutor of the Enron Case, John Hueston). I chose the firm because the type of work they did sounded interesting to me (and they offered me a job before the other 2 places got back to me). While the details of the job were somewhat non-transferable, I received a phenomenal insight into the daily lives of low level big law associates. |
|
<
< | I felt the firm hired a variety of personalities, there were neurotic meddlers, "nice guys", passive-aggressive types and others who were united in that they were drawn to a boutique litigation firm after working or clerking somewhere else first. My observations that most of the work they did was highly uninspiring and many quit after working for just one year (part of their hiring model for annual recruitment one partner quipped to me). Thus I came into law school pretty unamused with the "BigLaw" career as a substantive category. |
>
> | I felt the firm hired a variety of personalities, there were neurotic meddlers, "nice guys", passive-aggressive types and others who were united in that they were drawn to a boutique litigation firm after working or clerking somewhere else first. Most of them practiced work which they felt was highly uninspiring and many quit after working for just one year (part of their hiring model for annual recruitment one partner quipped to me). Thus I came into law school pretty unamused with the "BigLaw" career as a substantive category. |
| | |
|
<
< | The Private Sector Dynamic in Morningside Heights: The Vault 10 Draft |
>
> | The Private Sector Dynamic in Morningside Heights |
| | While It would be naive for me to say that coming to Columbia it was unexpected that there was a high amount of institutional reverence to the "BigLaw" legal industry, I was rightly shocked by the amount of people coming into 1L with standing offers from firms they worked at over the summer.
Too Soon? |
|
<
< | One of my issues with this practice is the speed. Students just started learning the fundamentals but if you are already locked in for a job the coming summer—there could be a tendency to lose incentive to really engage for the sake of it. To use the terminology from the class, these sort of dynamics speed up the "tuna-canning process" |
>
> | One of my issues with this practice is the speed. Students just started learning the fundamentals but if you are already locked in for a job the coming summer—there could be a tendency to lose incentive to really engage for the sake of it. To use the terminology from the class, I believe this dynamic only speeds up the "tuna-canning process", at what point do we start applying to law firms along with law school admission applications? |
| | |
|
<
< | My Future & Conflicts: |
>
> | Institutional Issue:
If students come into law school with outstanding offers, what exactly is the point of a 3 year education? Furthermore why is it inappropriate to question why the move towards an earlier and even earlier summer associate hiring process should be seen as a bit odd as opposed to an "opportunity". I've asked several associates & partners at firms how they feel about how much earlier the EIP process is compared to when they were in school and most generally responses don't generally think about any un-intended effects of this system over the course of the next 10-20 years. |
| | |
|
>
> | Dishonesty
The final issue I was surprised by was the amount of dishonesty displayed across the board. Phrases and words like "Collegial","respectful of your vacation days", "respectful" become buzzwords as if any of JD candidates haven't come in already at least somewhat aware of the relentlessness of the majority of "BigLaw" summer associates. Perhaps what's equally concerning is the dishonesty I have with myself. On one hand, I can confidently I wouldn't outwardly choose to work in "BigLaw" at as it exists right now. On the other hand, even an adjusted pay rate of $60/hour seems enticing at least for enough time to pay off loans and acquire some savings. However therein lies the dishonesty that I've come to struggle with...we've discussed how money functions similarly to addictive drugs in our brain which is why it's conflicting to think deeply and tell myself "Yes Rafael its only 3 years and then you'll exit and then you can pursue what it is that you wanted to pursue". Of course, the question of thinking on what I actually want to pursue is either so implied that it is buried or never really explored (because in either case, those paths could be done after a stint at Paul, Weiss).
This of course is a fairly typical mind path for many people in law school, especially at Columbia.
My Future (Hopeful)
Long Term:
I knew coming into law school that I wanted to do litigation. In an ideal world, I engage primarily in civil litigation involving police brutality lawsuits and wrongful conviction lawsuits while also maintaining a smaller criminal defense practice. I plan to become a prosecutor first, primarily for the trial experience and secondarily for the credibility for issues related to civil suits against government actors (such as police officers, security guards etc.). Perhaps one of the biggest reasons I desire to embark on this path is the delicate focus on person to person interactions. I agree with the sentiment that lawyering is a people centered category of work and I feel plaintiff side civil litigation is notably even more based around client interactions.
Short Term:
Money, loans, income, the ability to live in NYC. I believe this is where the confusion starts. Confusion is the short way of saying, it is very difficult from a logistics perspective to hash out how I could manage a life in NYC while doing work that may pay very little while I work towards gaining more trial experience. My concern for starting a career in BigLaw can't be emphasized enough yet it feels evermore intoxicating as even an adjusted salary of $60/hr (taxes and accounting for hours worked as discussed in class) feels reasonable. |
| | |
|
<
< | I knew coming into law school that I wanted to do litigation. In an ideal world, I engage primarily in civil litigation involving police brutality lawsuits and wrongful conviction lawsuits while also maintaining a smaller criminal defense practice. Of course, I feel like to get there I'd like to become a prosecutor first, primarily for the trial experience and secondarily for the credibility for issues related to civil suits against government actors (such as police officers, security guards etc.). |
| | |