Law in Contemporary Society

View   r3  >  r2  ...
RyanBinghamSecondPaper 3 - 24 Apr 2012 - Main.RyanBingham
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="SecondPaper"
Line: 48 to 48
 

Conclusion

Added:
>
>		CISPA is diametrically opposed to the Fourth Amendment's protection to the "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." It undermines Katz v. United States 389 U.S. 347, which held that the "Government's activities in electronically listening to and recording [...] constituted a 'search and seizure' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment." It removes several important protections to the potential for privacy on the internet.
 CISPA weakens online privacy and personal liberty because it invents an overly broad category of information that is allowed to be collected and distributed far and wide, and because it provides for a range of exemptions designed to either stifle or circumvent normal checks on the unwarranted collection and unjustifiable sharing of heretofore private information.

Changed:
<
<		868 words
>
>		945 words
 

Revision 3r3 - 24 Apr 2012 - 13:55:01 - RyanBingham
Revision 2r2 - 24 Apr 2012 - 00:02:16 - RyanBingham
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM