Law in Contemporary Society

View   r3  >  r2  ...
TedKreitSecondPaper 3 - 22 Apr 2008 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"

A Problem in Privilege II

Line: 34 to 34
 -- TedKreit - 04 Apr 2008
Added:
>
>
  • All very well, but you have only shown that Coventry and Kunz could not have released the affidavit they drew concerning Wilson--that, and disposed by the way of some suggestions by colleagues that were, frankly, irrelevant. You have not shown that Coventry and Kunz had no better way to handle the situation originally. They are either to be credited, as you try to credit them, with having secured eventual justice, or they are to be criticized for not finding a way to secure the release of Logan without prejudicing their client in the first place. You have acquitted them on that point hastily, without analysis, and, arguably, wrongfully. At any rate you have not considered the subject thoroughly, as I told you before. It's not my job to tell you what you should have looked for: you're the one claiming exhaustive thinking here. Drop the Massachusetts bullshit, the "some have claimed, ... but I don't think so" march-up-march-down space-wasting, and put your head back in the situation as it stood when the decision to draw the affidavit was made.

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

Revision 3r3 - 22 Apr 2008 - 19:50:27 - EbenMoglen
Revision 2r2 - 11 Apr 2008 - 15:01:15 - TedKreit
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM