Law in Contemporary Society

View   r5  >  r4  ...
TemiAdenijiSecondPaper 5 - 23 Apr 2010 - Main.ShawnFetty
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="SecondPaper"
-- TemiAdeniji - 17 Apr 2010
Line: 37 to 37
 Veblen’s reluctance to provide any cathartic solution for the reader can be reduced to his failure to quench the reader’s desire for a climax and denouement, leaving a feeling of uneasiness. we did only read chapters 1-5. Decolonization is much the same. We sit in a state of flux, “pontificating” if you will, about what will become of the African state. We have no clue what is going to happen to Africa.

To conclude, one another reference to Cesaire: “The truth is that I have said something very different: to wit, that the great historical tragedy of Africa has been not so much that it was too late in making contact with the rest of the world, as the manner in which that contact was brought about.” So it could be that the edifices themselves are not problematic; rather, the pattern of imposition is what created and continues to perpetuate the dilemma. Cesaire says that what happened wasn't about Africa's failings with respect to the western world, but the other way around. I am not sure what your closing sentence means.

Added:
>
>

Hi, I know it's not my responsibility to comment, but I thought I might be able to help. I have no idea if you are aware or not, but the whole "thingification" deal is part of a pretty long conversation among writers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reification_(Marxism) ~Shawn

 \ No newline at end of file

Revision 5r5 - 23 Apr 2010 - 10:15:57 - ShawnFetty
Revision 4r4 - 22 Apr 2010 - 19:44:33 - NonaFarahnik
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM