Law in Contemporary Society

View   r5  >  r4  ...
TheInternetAndTheNewRacism 5 - 12 Apr 2012 - Main.ManuelLorenzo
Line: 1 to 1
 Every time I read a news article, a blog post, or anything else on the internet related to the issue of race, I try to avoid reading the user comments. The reason is that I know, with all certainty, that there will be a small but vocal group of anonymous posters who thrive on using their anonymity to incite racial hatred. I wish I could say that this was limited to an uneducated group of Mississippi rednecks, but even comments on race-related posts on Above the Law can rise to this level of small-minded discourse.

In fact, with the increasing popularity of twitter, many people don’t even try to hide behind a shroud of anonymity anymore. Most recently, with the release of the Hunger Games movie, there was a widely reported instance of apparent dissatisfaction and disapproval with the fact that many of the “good” characters in the movie were black. Of course, as soon as these users became aware that their tweets were being reported on major news sources like the Huffington Post, without their usernames redacted, they either deleted their tweets and made their accounts private or shut down their accounts altogether.

Line: 55 to 55
 To go to Cameron's point, I absolutely agree that the internet is a reflection of our broader society. When people try to argue that we are living in a post-racial America, the first thing I point to is the fact that, besides all the elements of white supremacist infrastructure that exist in our society today, racism is alive and well, and the most potent example is that people think it is ok to make whatever racist comments they want on the internet. It may not be anywhere near as bad as cross-burning or lynching anymore, but the internet has just allowed for a different form of racism to manifest itself. On the other hand, as our society as a whole becomes more educated, comments like these are increasingly seen as wrong and many commenters who aren't members of the particular group being disparaged are coming forward and writing rebuttals.

-- JasonPyke - 11 Apr 2012

Added:
>
>
I agree with most of the points made above. I think internet commentary/postings have enabled people to feel free to say whatever they want with no fear of public reprisal or retribution. Many of these offensive commentaries tend to be a mix of someone wanting to spark controversy as well as voice their actual opinions. In regards to the Hunger Games posts specifically, I thought the comments were probably a mixture (as mentioned above), but also reflect some of the struggles black actors are faced with when it comes to casting decisions in Hollywood. For instance, a couple of months ago when George Lucas was doing promotional work for the movie Red Tails, he spoke about the difficulties of trying to find funding for a movie featuring a predominantly black cast. Minority actors in general have had trouble securing roles in which they are the headliners. Despite the successes of actors such as Halle Berry and Denzel Washington, minority actors have not had significantly greater access to film roles. Even this year when Octavia Spencer won the oscar for best supporting actress, she was being recognized for a stereotypical role traditionally relegated to black women (not to take anything away from her performance, which was well deserving). The Hunger Games commentators showed a disapproval of using black actors for roles in which they had envisioned white characters. These comments, even those that were just meant to spark controversy, reflect the continued struggle for black actors to obtain acting jobs that do not pigeon hole them into certain stereotypes, e.g. thug, drug dealer, crooked cop, etc. As everyone has pointed out, the proper response is not censor the commentators (which would be an example of the cure being worse than the disease), but for there to be more vocal backlash against people who make these kinds of statements. There will most likely always be some forms of racism in this country, but the important point is to emphasize that racist commentary is not tolerated and does not have a place in civil public discourse.

-- ManuelLorenzo - 11 Apr 2012


Revision 5r5 - 12 Apr 2012 - 02:00:42 - ManuelLorenzo
Revision 4r4 - 11 Apr 2012 - 21:51:55 - JasonPyke
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM