Law in Contemporary Society

View   r48  >  r47  ...
TimelySubmissionOfGrades 48 - 10 Jul 2012 - Main.RohanGrey
Line: 1 to 1
           Days after we finished our finals we received the following email from the Dean of our law school which I am reposting here:

Line: 401 to 401
 I will be the first to say that the grading system should change, or at least be transparent. But the premise of this thread is that there was something wrong with Dean Schizer's email. I don't think there is. Professors should get grades in on time. Period. It shouldn't take more than a month to grade 120 exams when that is the only feedback they provide all semester. There are plenty of things to be upset with the administration about. This isn't one of them.

-- HarryKhanna 10 Jul 2012

Added:
>
>
If the only issue behind Dean Schizer's email is whether a professor could sit on their exams for an extra month or not, perhaps we would be having a different conversation. But aside from the obvious and uncontroversial problems with the perspective that law students' biggest concern today is/should be the speed with which their transcript is updated, this proposal has deeper and more insidious implications. Most importantly, there are many reasons why a professor may choose to take time before providing a final grade, including but not limited to the desire to maintain a sense of continuous learning beyond the final "break point" of the last day of the formal semester. For the hypothetical professor - let's just call them EM - who feels that the grading system is damaging to the learning process they are trying to create, this process of public shaming and fining is an attempt to ensure compliance to the administration's goals at the expense of their own educational vision.

I don't think anyone who took this class was mislead about Eben's views on grading, nor have they been denied the ability to receive a grade within the administratively determined time period. But by attempting to empower students by giving them grades in a more timely manner, this policy ends up disenfranchising those who wish to have an alternative learning experience with professors who are willing to provide it by pressuring professors to fall in line.

Furthermore, this email frames the entire problem as one of professorial laziness rather than administrative structure and a failure of managing the various expectations placed on academics. Perhaps this proposal would be more palatable to me if Dean Schizer had promised to place himself and every member of his administration on every public shaming list and also agree to a personal fine equivalent to the sum total of all fines allocated on professors as a demonstration of the equal responsibility of management as well as the workers in addressing this issue. Until then, I remain outraged.


Revision 48r48 - 10 Jul 2012 - 15:32:41 - RohanGrey
Revision 47r47 - 10 Jul 2012 - 15:07:24 - HarryKhanna
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM