Law in Contemporary Society

View   r13  >  r12  ...
WeAreAllKin 13 - 02 Mar 2010 - Main.NonaFarahnik
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="EbenSalon"
-- NonaFarahnik - 25 Feb 2010
Added:
>
>
Since I started this Talk page and I get to edit everyone's stuff pretty soon, I have some sort of power over what goes on here. As such, I am going to pretend that whoever else comments will listen to what I say. I find it offensive and counter-productive to our conversation when we malign another person's comments by acting so incredulous as to be demeaning. There is a fine line between when criticism stops being constructive and sometimes we all (including myself) pass it. Eben is the benevolent monarch and he knows what he is doing, even though I question the effectiveness of some of the language he uses with his scary red text. If we are bemoaning the lack of empathy in the way we treat "other living things" we should at least be mindful of the fact that those other living things have feelings. We undermine the very purpose of this class when we scare people into silence, which is why some people never take a stab at joining the conversation. I Will edit your mean comments away. I AM THE MONARCH OF MY TALK PAGES AND MY TALK PAGES ARE FRIENDLY TALK PAGES :).
 Post publishing note 2: This class is extremely important to me and my criticisms are made in light of my obligation to be an active force in my legal education.

I was pretty riled up after class today. Of course, part of the problem is that Eben is one of the most knowledgeable people I have met. Arguing with him feels like taking a paintball gun to a tank (it is difficult to use a metaphor because I know Eben can immediately break it down to its precise historical meaning and quickly strip away the basis of an ill-informed comparison). In general, this is good because it requires us to do our homework, and to choose our words carefully and precisely. Still, it leaves me knowing that my argument will always be vulnerable to some historical reality I have never contended with or the misuse of a word that wasn't even central to my point in the first place.

Line: 45 to 49
 -- MatthewZorn 28 Feb 2010 - 23:21:18 -
Changed:
<
<
You're kidding, right? Like this guy? I'll get to your other absurdities down below in a minute, but for now I'd love to understand why it would be in our interest to perpetuate an idea of moral difference between ourselves and other living things. Can you sell me that one? The argument should be even easier than just the difference between ourselves and other people. Do you even see why dropping those distinctions might be productive for us, or have you never listened to the other side of the debate you think you're in? -- DRussellKraft - 01 Mar 2010
>
>
You're kidding, right? Like this guy? Why is it in our interest to perpetuate an idea of moral difference between ourselves and other living things. Can you sell me that one? The argument should be even easier than just the difference between ourselves and other people. Do you even see why dropping those distinctions might be productive for us?? -- DRussellKraft - 01 Mar 2010
 

Revision 13r13 - 02 Mar 2010 - 00:44:01 - NonaFarahnik
Revision 12r12 - 01 Mar 2010 - 23:48:28 - DRussellKraft
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM