Law in Contemporary Society

View   r2  >  r1  ...
WhichWasteToDispatch 2 - 30 Mar 2009 - Main.LaurenRosenberg
Line: 1 to 1
 Our discussion about Veblen and conspicuous waste reminded me of this article, which ran before things started to get really bad on Wall Street.

Are these lifestyle changes based on dispatching the things that are of the least utility or, alternatively, the things that are the least conspicuous? Is there a difference? Using law firms as an example, between layoffs, trimming summer programs, and the like, which pattern do they seem to follow? -- KahlilWilliams - 26 Mar 2009

Added:
>
>
My immediate reaction to this article was a complete lack of sympathy and utter shock at the way these millionaires are reacting to the economic crisis. Shouldn't they recognize that they can give up certain luxuries and still be among the nation's wealthiest? Do they not recognize that many individuals can't even pay their mortgages and feed their families? On further reflection, I recognize that these millionaires' livelihoods might be based upon their previous patterns of conspicuous waste. As Eben pointed out in class, success in certain business ventures (including management of large non-profit organizations) is often dependent upon assuming a high-class lifestyle.

I'm not sure whether we can analyze the waste that is being discarded in a Veblen sense, as it seems like these individuals are running on fumes and not giving sufficient thought to their spending habits. Moreover, since this article presents a very small sample of individuals, it may not represent the general trend of cutting back for the nation's elite. Nonetheless, it does appear that these individuals are attempting to discard their least conspicuous habits, such as those expensive personal training sessions. From a rational perspective those training sessions (at $165 an hour) are not nearly as important as the jet-setting (at $10,000 an hour), but if these individuals can maintain their place in society by cutting out their personal trainer then it may be worthwhile to them.

-- LaurenRosenberg - 30 Mar 2009


WhichWasteToDispatch 1 - 26 Mar 2009 - Main.KahlilWilliams
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
Our discussion about Veblen and conspicuous waste reminded me of this article, which ran before things started to get really bad on Wall Street.

Are these lifestyle changes based on dispatching the things that are of the least utility or, alternatively, the things that are the least conspicuous? Is there a difference? Using law firms as an example, between layoffs, trimming summer programs, and the like, which pattern do they seem to follow? -- KahlilWilliams - 26 Mar 2009


Revision 2r2 - 30 Mar 2009 - 02:19:06 - LaurenRosenberg
Revision 1r1 - 26 Mar 2009 - 18:06:30 - KahlilWilliams
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM