You and ACLU are both taking Apple marketing announcements as fact. This is a basic error for lawyers. ACLU is more at fault than you, of course. For the moment, a company that has been most severely complicit with broad-scale spying on its users, forever, and which last week suffered horrendously bad publicity just at the beginning of a major product marketing campaign, has suddenly realized that its new product has software features it forgot to mention before, at announcement, very important to everyone's safety, which they could also provide to existing products (because it's all just software and they control all their endpoints), but which you can only get by buying the new product. This has been greeted by substantial approval from people to whom they can contribute, and by howls of simulated disapproval by people whose every statement is a simulation. Also, their most frightening software competitor is doing it in the next release, as we will be able to verify, because their source code is available under free licenses.

You should not take statements literally from anyone, without checking. Let alone from the reality distortion field leftover from the King of the Undead, Now Dead. So what checking did you do?

"Apple Throws Down the Privacy Gauntlet" via Medium

Cliff's notes for the tl;dr-inclined:

-Apple announces that they have eliminated their ability to extract data from iOS devices, for themselves or on behalf of governments

-ACLU praises Apple for "delivering end-to-end encrypted text, voice, and video communications...(via) iMessage and FaceTime? ," calling these "a much more secure alternative to regular telephone calls and text messages."

-- TomLawrence - 26 Sep 2014

<--/commentPlugin-->