Law in the Internet Society

View   r3  >  r2  ...
AlfonsoJimenez1stPaper 3 - 13 Jan 2009 - Main.AlfonsoJimenez
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
Changed:
<
<		Updated revision of 1st Paper: I wrote a heavily rhetorical version of this already that was rejected by Professor Moglen. I have clarified some of my thoughts here. My argument was basically that Internet access should be a positive right, and since the federal Constitution is wary of recognizing positive rights that could prove disruptive to the social order, I recommended we try to make provision of the Internet a duty of the states.
>
>		Revised 1st Paper: I wrote a heavily rhetorical version of this already that was rejected by Professor Moglen. I have clarified some of my thoughts here. My argument was basically that Internet access should be a positive right, and since the federal Constitution is wary of recognizing positive rights that could prove disruptive to the social order, I recommended we try to make provision of the Internet a duty of the states.
 

Would a state created right run into federal obstacles?


Revision 3r3 - 13 Jan 2009 - 14:58:51 - AlfonsoJimenez
Revision 2r2 - 13 Jan 2009 - 01:01:21 - AlfonsoJimenez
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM