| |
BrendanMulliganSecondPaper 7 - 09 May 2010 - Main.EbenMoglen
|
|
META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondPaper" |
Ready for review.
Establishing a Private, Workable Online Medical Database | |
< < | -- By BrendanMulligan? | > > | -- By BrendanMulligan | | In its 1999 report, “To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System”, the Institute of Medicine claimed that preventable medical errors cause as many as 98,000 deaths per year in the United States and upwards of $29 billion annually in lost income, lost production, disability, and additional health care costs. According to the report, decentralization and fragmentation of the health care system are major causes of these errors. Providers lack access to complete patient data at the point of care. Fewer than 2% of the nation's 5,000 non-VA hospitals have what could be considered a full-fledged system. | | This rule is indefensible even with paper files but increased, easy, and remote access to personal health data make it particularly dangerous. As we move towards integrated EHR system, this provision must be changed. Congress could start by revisiting the House’s 2004 STOHP Act, which makes consent the core of disclosure. In effect, the change would require individuals to give or withhold consent before their personal health information is used or disclosed before each routine purposes, instead of a one-time consent as in effect now. | |
< < |
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" on the next line:
# * Set ALLOWTOPICVIEW = TWikiAdminGroup, BrendanMulligan
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of that line. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated list | | \ No newline at end of file | |
> > | There are really two
topics here, and it would be worth the effort of choosing between
them. The HIPAA issue you raise is a matter subject to political
deadlock. Any legislation that tries to move in the area will
immediately be subject to encrustation with all the other conflicting
claims by all the other parties who believe that free market
capitalism means that government should never do anything that hurts
their business, which has generated enough money to put a cousin or a
brother in the Senate. All you can really do is to reprint earnest
staff reports that will never get enacted. VistA? , on the other hand,
can be developed, as you point out, by executive action alone, if the
Administration is prepared to take some heat from people whose
proprietary software businesses would be wiped out by it. There are
technical issues you should have described to some extent, and you
should have discussed OpenVistA? , which is the Free World's attempt to
meet some of those technical problems. You might also have discussed
the possibility of following in the steps of Finland, which now runs
its national system of hospitals on its version of the VistA? we
developed and put into the public domain for them. Obviously I think
this aspect of the situation would make the VistA? portion of the
essay the one to expand, but either way, you will do a far more
effective job if you don't have to give away half the
space. | | \ No newline at end of file |
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|
| |