Law in the Internet Society

View   r16  >  r15  ...
BrianSFirstPaper 16 - 29 Jan 2010 - Main.BrianS
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Added:
>
>
This document is under revision and not yet ready for a second review.
 
Line: 107 to 109
  its politics in the substance of the Internet itself. You're not going to do it this way.
Added:
>
>

Professor Moglen,

Thank you for your comments. While I do think the DMCA is an unwise statutory device, I know that the glancing blows I have thrown at it here will not result in a knockout. Far from it. And I do think that the First Amendment argument is stronger than the general policy observation I have made here. The only reason I did not tackle it instead was because I did not think I could to it justice in 1000 words.

My goal here was to communicate succinctly that there are sound reasons to question the DMCA model. I sought to do so because remarkably it seems that some have not recognized the dangers of the DMCA, some who are not purple-tongued Kool Aid drinkers but are nevertheless unaware of the DMCA's threat.

Thank you again for your comments. I will consider if there are ways I can revise to address your well-taken points.

-- BrianS - 29 Jan 2010

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

Revision 16r16 - 29 Jan 2010 - 22:11:04 - BrianS
Revision 15r15 - 25 Jan 2010 - 14:47:57 - EbenMoglen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM