| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
[READY FOR REVIEW] | |
<
< | Networking Brains: Making Change Happen with Bits | >
> | Brains as Networks, Societies as Networks: A Narrative about Making Social Change Happen with Bits | | | | | | III. Social Psychology | |
<
< | Moving up a level of analysis, the network metaphor is also generative of useful insights when applied to social psychology. One quality of a using a network metaphor to look out at the social world is that it highlights the critical importance of information flows. Musician Ian MacKaye, talking about his childhood in Washington D.C., which involved a significant amount of skateboarding, related once that skateboarding was an important phase of his life. It trained him to look at the world as a place full of opportunities to ride a skateboard off things, not just a venue for the conduct of ordinary life. This was, on later reflection, an education in the power of looking at the structures of the world differently than most and using them in a different way - hacking, in a sense. | >
> | Moving up a level of analysis, the network metaphor is also generative of useful insights when applied to social psychology. If we think of brains as networks, maybe societies are networks of networks.
One quality of a using a network metaphor to look out at the social world is that it highlights the critical importance of information flows. Musician Ian MacKaye, talking about his childhood in Washington D.C., which involved a significant amount of skateboarding, related once that skateboarding was an important phase of his life. It trained him to look at the world as a place full of opportunities to ride a skateboard off things, not just a venue for the conduct of ordinary life. This was, on later reflection, an education in the power of looking at the structures of the world differently than most and using them in a different way - hacking, in a sense. | | | Similarly, a social grouping of brains is a lot of things at the same time, but if, using a network metaphor, we focus on how interlinked our brains are, we see a rich array opportunities for communication and social change. If, as I proposed above, we agree with Lessig that code is law, and we consider that the genes and memories that comprise our personal psychological network are our source code, well-tailored memes can change the source code of many individuals rapidly and produce new combinations and unanticipated results. We can see dynamic in the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street. | |
<
< | It's now a banality that the interlacing of a computer network into human networks means that memes can spread further faster than in previous technological eras. However, it's important to note that this phenomenon is not just a matter of faster communication, it's also a constitutive process. After A shares information with B, information is transmitted. They are also now A1 and B1. As an Egyptian activist noted of the Egyptian uprising, "Before this social-media revolution, everyone was very individual, very single, very isolated and oppressed in islands...But social media has created bridges, has created channels between individuals, between activists, between even ordinary men, to speak out, to know that there are other men who think like me. We can work together, we can make something together." If we have a theory of self in which psychological structures can change based on context (rather than a notion of fixed character or personality), we might be receptive to the idea that communication changes not just what we know, but who we are. Our "source code" is different, and so the "rules of the game" are now different. In a sense, the law is different. | >
> | What happens when we take the human network of networks and interconnect a technological network? It's now a banality that the interlacing of a computer network into human networks means that memes can spread further faster than in previous technological eras. However, it's important to note that this phenomenon is not just a matter of faster communication, it's also a constitutive process. After A shares information with B, information is transmitted. They are also now A1 and B1. As an Egyptian activist noted of the Egyptian uprising, "Before this social-media revolution, everyone was very individual, very single, very isolated and oppressed in islands...But social media has created bridges, has created channels between individuals, between activists, between even ordinary men, to speak out, to know that there are other men who think like me. We can work together, we can make something together." If we have a theory of self in which psychological structures can change based on context (rather than a notion of fixed character or personality), we might be receptive to the idea that communication changes not just what we know, but who we are. Our "source code" is different, and so the "rules of the game" are now different. In a sense, the law is different. | | | If we are interested in social change, thinking about our brains and our societies using the network metaphor generates some interesting strategic ideas. There are new, different ways to create change using words now. As the New Yorker relates, the original proposal for Occupy Wall Street emerged from the network-based collaboration between a man who lives in Berkeley, CA and a man who lives on a farm outside Vancouver. "Occupy-identified" groups have since spread around the world. The "Takriz" group which helped coordinate the Tunisian revolution began life as an email listserv and spread memes using Facebook. Both are examples of people who were not physically copresent, but who collaborated in shaping bitstreams of information that so appealed to other human brains that it helped stir them to passionate action, with significant real world results.
\ No newline at end of file |
|