Law in the Internet Society

View   r3  >  r2  ...
KristofferRaknerFirstEssay 3 - 22 Nov 2016 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Deleted:
<
<		It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
 

Wrongful beyond borders?

Line: 39 to 38
 Read as a whole the main difference between the two approaches is Borgarting's seemingly narrow approach to the issues, as it consistently focus on Johansen's acts instead of the implications his action could have for illegal copying. This stands in contrast to the more principal, general approach seemingly adopted by the American courts. However, the differences may be attributable to the difference in the two proceedings posture, in that the Norwegian proceedings were criminal and the American proceedings were civil. Thus, the difference between the proceedings is not necessarily attributable to a difference between the perception of the wrongfulness of the development of DeCSS? .
Added:
>
>
No, the difference is that the statutes involved are completely different, having both different purposes and different operative provisions. The best route to improvement is to replace this unfounded speculation about procedural differences with a discussion of the DMCA anti-circumvention provision.

 

Revision 3r3 - 22 Nov 2016 - 14:03:56 - EbenMoglen
Revision 2r2 - 03 Nov 2016 - 15:22:06 - KristofferRakner
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM