|
MakalikaNaholowaaFirstPaper 2 - 26 Nov 2009 - Main.MakalikaNaholowaa
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstPaper" |
|---|
| |
<
< | The Absence of Marketing Regulations for Social Networks, and the Potential for Greater Privacy on Non-Profit Social Networks | >
> | READY FOR REVIEW
Privacy and Social Networking: The Absence of Regulation Makes Non-Profits A Better Option for Users | | | -- By MakalikaNaholowaa - 08 Nov 2009
I’m Worried that Advertisers Are Learning Too Much About Me on Facebook | |
<
< | Companies use many lures to entice online users into surrendering their privacy, like discounts on goods or “free” access to resources for the bargain price of their identity and usage data. But corporate-America has negotiated no better deal with users for this information than on social networks. At sites like Facebook, LinkedIn? or MySpace? users feed private interests more data, at a higher level of detail, in real time, than was ever collected by a retailer’s registration form or user purchase history. With status updates, profile information, fan pages and events, users are telling social networks everything about themselves, right down to their favorite midnight snack. Information that could only be roughly inferred before is now freely offered up, straight from the horse’s mouth, and therefore with stunning accuracy. | >
> | Companies use many lures to entice online users into surrendering their privacy, such as discounts on goods or “free” access to resources for the bargain price of their identity and usage data. But corporate-America has negotiated no better deal with users for this information than on monetized social networks. At sites like Facebook or MySpace? , users feed corporations more personal data than was ever collected by a retailer’s registration form or user purchase history. With status updates, profile information, and events, users are telling social networks everything about themselves. Information that could only be roughly inferred before is now freely offered up, straight from the horse’s mouth, and therefore with previously unimaginable accuracy. | | | And of course the data is being put to work. For example, soon after creating a Facebook event titled “baby shower,” the ads served to my profile page included titles like “Are you a game-loving mom?” and “Win Disney on Ice Tickets!” | |
<
< | Surveys show that Americans have always been suspicious about companies’ use of their personal information online. But, as people begin to notice the efficiency with which social networks mine the data they are fed to tailor advertisements at an individual level, users’ unease is rising. People are taking pause from their not subtle attempts to seem more interesting than their closest three or four hundred friends and developing concern about what CafeMom? and Disney are learning about them. | >
> | Surveys show that Americans have long been concerned about companies’ use of their personal information acquired online. But, as people begin to notice the efficiency with which social networks mine the data they are fed to tailor advertisements served at an individual level, users’ unease is rising. People are taking pause from their attempts to seem more interesting than their closest three or four hundred "friends" and developing concern about what CafeMom? and Disney are learning about them. | | | | |
<
< | This raises the question: what legal duties do social networks have when using personal information to sell advertising? The answer: pretty much none in the United States, and for practical purposes, none within the European Union either. | >
> | This raises the question: what legal duties do social networks have when using users' personal information to sell advertising? The answer: pretty much none in the United States, and for practical purposes, none within the European Union either. | | | The United States Doesn’t Care, the European Union Cares but Can’t Help
American Law | |
<
< | US law is mostly silent with regard to how social networks handle user information, particularly in regards to marketing. At the federal level, address of marketing practices on social networks seems mostly to be happening at the FTC whose current approach is working with stakeholders to formulate principles for social networks to self-regulate. At the state level, the past two years have resulted in a smattering of social network specific bills centered on the public’s concern about children’s safety and the distribution of unflattering photographs online. Also focused narrowly on child safety, a working group of attorneys general from 49 states and the District of Columbia signed agreements with Facebook and Myspace in 2008 outlining a plan to decrease children’s risk of falling prey to sexual predators and peddlers of cigarettes and alcohol. | >
> | US law is mostly silent with regard to how social networks handle user information, particularly in regards to marketing. At the federal level, address of marketing practices on social networks seems mostly to be happening at the FTC. The FTC's current approach is to work with stakeholders to formulate principles for social network self-regulation. At the state level, the past two years have resulted in a smattering of social network specific bills centered on the public’s concern about children’s safety and the unwanted distribution of unflattering photographs online. Also focused narrowly on child safety, a working group of attorneys general from 49 states and the District of Columbia signed agreements with Facebook and Myspace in 2008 outlining a plan to decrease children’s risk of falling prey to sexual predators and peddlers of cigarettes and alcohol. None of this work has created significant data protection for social network users. | | | The Law in Europe | |
<
< | Within the EU, where the horrendous consequences of privacy infringement in World War II created a populous more protective of its human right to privacy, citizens fare better on paper. Social networks within the European Economic Area are subject to the same rules as other “data controllers.” This imposes restrictions on social networks’ use of personal data for marketing, such as how social networks share user data with third parties and how long they can retain a user’s data. Social networks are also prohibited from creating personal profiles about non-users with data inferred by information provided by users. However, the protection these provisions provide are practically voided by enforcement issues. Each member state is tasked with creating and enforcing their own local law consistent with the EU rules. This creates issues of uneven enforcement, penalties, and compliance that lessen whatever victory the EU rules represent for privacy advocates. | >
> | Within the EU, where some believe the horrendous consequences of privacy infringement in World War II created a populous more protective of its human right to privacy than Americans, citizens fare better on paper. Social networks within the European Economic Area are subject to the same rules as other “data controllers.” This imposes restrictions on social networks’ use of personal data for marketing, such as how social networks share user data with third parties and how long they can retain a user’s data. Social networks are also prohibited from creating personal profiles about non-users with data inferred by information provided by users. However, the protection these provisions provide are practically voided by enforcement issues. Each member state is tasked with creating and enforcing their own local law consistent with the EU rules. This creates issues of uneven enforcement, penalties, and compliance that lessen whatever victory the EU rules represent for privacy advocates. | | | | |
<
< | Facebook Isn't Working in Your Interest and the Law Doesn't Protect You, so Move off of It | >
> | Facebook Isn't Working in Your Interest and the Law Doesn't Protect You There, so Move Away From It | | | | |
<
< | The business model of popular social networks depends on marketing. Neither the US nor the EU are willing to enact regulations crippling that model. And, although social networks like Facebook are credited for continually working with governments to address privacy concerns, obligations to investors and the for-profit character of currently popular social networks make true respect for user privacy difficult to honor without real regulation. | >
> | Today's dominate social networks are for-profit and their business models depend on marketing. As reflected in the current state of the law, neither the US nor the EU are willing to enact regulations crippling those models. And, although social networks like Facebook are often credited for continually working with governments to address privacy concerns, obligations to investors and their for-profit character make true respect for user privacy difficult to honor without real regulation. | | | | |
<
< | But a social network does not require a business model, investors, or profit goals. And if you remove the profit-focused elements from a social network, then there is no need for advertisers. Then social networks could stop infringing upon users’ freedom through the collection and manipulation of their data to enrich third party profit mongers. These types of social networks are available now. | >
> | But, a social network does not require a business model, investors, or profit goals. If you remove the profit-focused elements from a social network, then there is no need for advertisers. Then social networks could stop infringing upon users’ freedom through the collection and manipulation of their data to enrich third party profit mongers. These types of social networks are available now. | | | Facebook Alternatives Exist
For example, Kaioo, developed in Germany, is a non-profit social network funded by donations and offering very similar features as Facebook. Kaioo users own all of their data and Kaioo is working with users to develop terms and conditions that meet its community’s needs and desires on a site wiki. Kaioo is accepting registrations now.
Another example, Yakkit, is a non-profit niche social network going into beta late this year. It was developed by two developers, an artist, and a small group of educators collaborating across the U.S. in the evenings after leaving their day jobs. Costs for the project have been paid for by a relatively modest government grant. Yakkit does not plan to have advertisements or to share user data for any type of marketing. | |
<
< | Non-profit social networks like these do not address all concerns about privacy and social networking, but they demonstrate that people can have a forum for creating a community, in a form that has a proven demand, without being sold to the highest corporate bidders. And not-for-profit social networks like these are low level of effort alternatives to the monetized types dominating the landscape today. So tell your friends (and connections and buddies). | >
> | Non-profit social networks like these do not address all concerns about privacy and social networking. But, they demonstrate that people can have a forum for creating a community, in a form that has a proven appeal, without being sold to the highest corporate bidders. The technology is easy to reproduce and social network costs can be addressed without auctioning users to advertisers. And, for users, non-profit social networks like these are low level of effort alternatives to the monetized types dominating the landscape today. So tell your friends (and connections and buddies). | | |
|
|
|
MakalikaNaholowaaFirstPaper 1 - 09 Nov 2009 - Main.MakalikaNaholowaa
|
|
>
> |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstPaper" |
|---|
The Absence of Marketing Regulations for Social Networks, and the Potential for Greater Privacy on Non-Profit Social Networks
-- By MakalikaNaholowaa - 08 Nov 2009
I’m Worried that Advertisers Are Learning Too Much About Me on Facebook
Companies use many lures to entice online users into surrendering their privacy, like discounts on goods or “free” access to resources for the bargain price of their identity and usage data. But corporate-America has negotiated no better deal with users for this information than on social networks. At sites like Facebook, LinkedIn? or MySpace? users feed private interests more data, at a higher level of detail, in real time, than was ever collected by a retailer’s registration form or user purchase history. With status updates, profile information, fan pages and events, users are telling social networks everything about themselves, right down to their favorite midnight snack. Information that could only be roughly inferred before is now freely offered up, straight from the horse’s mouth, and therefore with stunning accuracy.
And of course the data is being put to work. For example, soon after creating a Facebook event titled “baby shower,” the ads served to my profile page included titles like “Are you a game-loving mom?” and “Win Disney on Ice Tickets!”
Surveys show that Americans have always been suspicious about companies’ use of their personal information online. But, as people begin to notice the efficiency with which social networks mine the data they are fed to tailor advertisements at an individual level, users’ unease is rising. People are taking pause from their not subtle attempts to seem more interesting than their closest three or four hundred friends and developing concern about what CafeMom? and Disney are learning about them.
This raises the question: what legal duties do social networks have when using personal information to sell advertising? The answer: pretty much none in the United States, and for practical purposes, none within the European Union either.
The United States Doesn’t Care, the European Union Cares but Can’t Help
American Law
US law is mostly silent with regard to how social networks handle user information, particularly in regards to marketing. At the federal level, address of marketing practices on social networks seems mostly to be happening at the FTC whose current approach is working with stakeholders to formulate principles for social networks to self-regulate. At the state level, the past two years have resulted in a smattering of social network specific bills centered on the public’s concern about children’s safety and the distribution of unflattering photographs online. Also focused narrowly on child safety, a working group of attorneys general from 49 states and the District of Columbia signed agreements with Facebook and Myspace in 2008 outlining a plan to decrease children’s risk of falling prey to sexual predators and peddlers of cigarettes and alcohol.
The Law in Europe
Within the EU, where the horrendous consequences of privacy infringement in World War II created a populous more protective of its human right to privacy, citizens fare better on paper. Social networks within the European Economic Area are subject to the same rules as other “data controllers.” This imposes restrictions on social networks’ use of personal data for marketing, such as how social networks share user data with third parties and how long they can retain a user’s data. Social networks are also prohibited from creating personal profiles about non-users with data inferred by information provided by users. However, the protection these provisions provide are practically voided by enforcement issues. Each member state is tasked with creating and enforcing their own local law consistent with the EU rules. This creates issues of uneven enforcement, penalties, and compliance that lessen whatever victory the EU rules represent for privacy advocates.
Facebook Isn't Working in Your Interest and the Law Doesn't Protect You, so Move off of It
The business model of popular social networks depends on marketing. Neither the US nor the EU are willing to enact regulations crippling that model. And, although social networks like Facebook are credited for continually working with governments to address privacy concerns, obligations to investors and the for-profit character of currently popular social networks make true respect for user privacy difficult to honor without real regulation.
But a social network does not require a business model, investors, or profit goals. And if you remove the profit-focused elements from a social network, then there is no need for advertisers. Then social networks could stop infringing upon users’ freedom through the collection and manipulation of their data to enrich third party profit mongers. These types of social networks are available now.
Facebook Alternatives Exist
For example, Kaioo, developed in Germany, is a non-profit social network funded by donations and offering very similar features as Facebook. Kaioo users own all of their data and Kaioo is working with users to develop terms and conditions that meet its community’s needs and desires on a site wiki. Kaioo is accepting registrations now.
Another example, Yakkit, is a non-profit niche social network going into beta late this year. It was developed by two developers, an artist, and a small group of educators collaborating across the U.S. in the evenings after leaving their day jobs. Costs for the project have been paid for by a relatively modest government grant. Yakkit does not plan to have advertisements or to share user data for any type of marketing.
Non-profit social networks like these do not address all concerns about privacy and social networking, but they demonstrate that people can have a forum for creating a community, in a form that has a proven demand, without being sold to the highest corporate bidders. And not-for-profit social networks like these are low level of effort alternatives to the monetized types dominating the landscape today. So tell your friends (and connections and buddies).
# * Set ALLOWTOPICVIEW = TWikiAdminGroup, MakalikaNaholowaa |
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|