Law in the Internet Society

View   r3  >  r2  ...
RickeyOrrFirstEssay 3 - 18 Nov 2024 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Deleted:
<
<
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
 

TikTok? ’s Assistance in the Whitewashing of Black Art

Line: 27 to 26
  Even though Black musicians helped pioneer major fashion aesthetics including Y2K? and McBling? , there is no clear way to ensure they receive credit for their contribution and to prevent others from being credited for it. A new area of law might be needed to do so. One that safeguards artistic contributions for overarching aesthetics in the same way that copyright law does for individual works of art. This would TikTok? ’s ability to further appropriate Black art by returning the credit for choreography and the Y2K? and McBling? aesthetics to the Black artists who originated them.
Added:
>
>
The draft appears to offer a generalizaed grievance about which TikTok is peripheral. That increasing property rights in art is good for marginalized makers of art is a debatable proposition, so it would certainly be an improvement to make the argument explicit and to consider the nature of the other relevant positions. Though the draft is well-documented with respect to social media gossip about artists, and claims of denial of credit, there's no relationship whatever to anyone else's scholarship, which would certainly be helpful.

 

Revision 3r3 - 18 Nov 2024 - 17:36:10 - EbenMoglen
Revision 2r2 - 11 Nov 2024 - 21:48:29 - RickeyOrr
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM