| |
SebastianBresserFirstEssay 3 - 05 Dec 2017 - Main.EbenMoglen
|
|
META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstEssay" |
| | I will focus on another example: Marketing. Marketing budgets (not: revenue) of large proprietary software companies dwarf those of open source software initiatives. The 2015 ad spent of Apple alone (before stopping disclosure) had risen to a record amount of $1.8 billion. Apple, more than any other software company before, put hard- and software design (as in aesthetics) at the very core of its product development and, like many other companies, cares more about communicating quality than about providing quality. Open source proponents, conversely, seem to hope that the quality (functional, not aesthetic) of the software advertises itself. Independent of whether this hope is the result of lacking understanding or lacking financial resources: the quality did and will not advertise itself. Hence, if open source software is to become the software of choice, it will also need a serious marketing budget. | |
> > |
Because I'm a reader who knows something about this subject, this
seems to me like a beginning basic introduction, where a reader less
informed might judge differently.
Whether intended for a general reader or a specialist, however, the
essay would certainly be improved by discussing the difference
between copyleft licensing, where the legal conditions on use of the
work are designed to protect users' rights, and "permissive"
licensing, in which the developers of new programs or versions of
programs have a right to render their own versions proprietary, thus
ousting users of their rights. A discussion of the difference would
be informative to general readers, and would help more expert
readers gain confidence in the analysis.
Similarly, I think you would improve the next draft by explaining
more fully why the "serious marketing budget" (which, for example,
Google and device manufacturers certainly have for Android) doesn't
really improve peoples' understanding of their rights in the
software they use, or how those rights should be protected.
| |
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|
| |