Law in the Internet Society

View   r6  >  r5  ...
TomGlaisyerPaper1EbensArgument 6 - 30 Sep 2008 - Main.TomGlaisyer
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"

Introduction

Added:
>
>
In this paper I want to examine Eben's argument regarding the way in which freedom emerges under the conditions of an internet society. I intend to engage with Eben's arguments from a skeptical position and interrogate whether his definition of an "internet society" privileges the anarchic production methods quite as much as he suggests.
 
Changed:
<
<
In this paper I want to examine Moglen's argument regarding the way in which freedom emerges under the conditions of an internet society. I intend to engage with Moglen's arguments from a skeptical position and interrogate whether his definition of an "internet society" privileges the anarchic production methods quite as much as he suggests.

  • I would prefer to be "Eben" than "Moglen" in this community, Tom. History will also be very impressed that you were on a first-name basis with me, even though you tried to reject my ideas.

Specifically, I will engage the arguments of Stark and Neff in "Permanently Beta," Noam's arguments in "The Economics of User Generated Content and Peer-to-Peer: The Commons as the Enabler of Commerce" since both of these suggest to that the method of production occurs only under a narrower set of conditions than those which Moglen has elaborated.

>
>
Specifically, I will engage the arguments of Stark and Neff in "Permanently Beta," Noam's arguments in "The Economics of User Generated Content and Peer-to-Peer: The Commons as the Enabler of Commerce," since both of these suggest to that the method of production occurs only under a narrower set of conditions than those which Eben has elaborated (so far).
 

Anarchic production

Changed:
<
<
- bring in Stark and heterarchy, Benkler and peer production
>
>
- Elaborate Eben's definition.
 
Changed:
<
<
  • I don't think you're going to succeed in starting an argument between Yochai and me, Tom. That's more likely to result in something like the Marshall McLuhan scene from Annie Hall. So far as Eli Noam is concerned, you will find it more interesting to look at Eli's bloviations over time, as he continues to try not to agree with me, but keeps edging closer to my positions under the pressure of the facts. You have, I understand, decided to impersonate the positions of outraged economic orthodoxy, which I welcome, but you will find the job is very much more difficult than you think. If I were you, I would listen for a couple more weeks before deciding what to write. Closing your mind at this stage is not even calculated to lead to the best closed-minded writing, let alone the best intellectual experience for you overall.
>
>
- Define in as rich a way as possible by bringing in Stark and heterarchy, Benkler and peer production
 

Proprietary production

Changed:
<
<
- private ownership of intellectual property
>
>
- Elaborate the alternative private ownership of intellectual property
 

Differences between the two modes of production

Changed:
<
<
-
>
>
- Mention certain case studies.
 

Contexts in which these modes work best

Changed:
<
<
- Noam
>
>
- Review Noam's arguments over time
 
Changed:
<
<
- Moglen
>
>
- Deishen Lee article
 
Added:
>
>
- Eben
 

Tendency for the anarchic mode to work more than in the past

Line: 46 to 43
 - necessary, but not sufficient conditions have been elaborated
Added:
>
>
or
 
Added:
>
>
- open source software will eliminate firm-market based production for "internet" goods permanently.
 

-- TomGlaisyer - 18 Sep 2008

Added:
>
>

Notes from Eben

* I don't think you're going to succeed in starting an argument between Yochai and me, Tom. That's more likely to result in something like the Marshall McLuhan scene from Annie Hall. So far as Eli Noam is concerned, you will find it more interesting to look at Eli's bloviations over time, as he continues to try not to agree with me, but keeps edging closer to my positions under the pressure of the facts. You have, I understand, decided to impersonate the positions of outraged economic orthodoxy, which I welcome, but you will find the job is very much more difficult than you think. If I were you, I would listen for a couple more weeks before deciding what to write. Closing your mind at this stage is not even calculated to lead to the best closed-minded writing, let alone the best intellectual experience for you overall.

 

If anyone has any comments on this please feel do add a comment

 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 6r6 - 30 Sep 2008 - 15:11:28 - TomGlaisyer
Revision 5r5 - 28 Sep 2008 - 14:53:43 - EbenMoglen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM