Law in the Internet Society

View   r4  >  r3  ...
UriHacohenFirstEssay 4 - 11 Oct 2014 - Main.UriHacohen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"

East of Eben

Changed:
<
<		In his Article "Software as Property: The Theoretical Paradox" (http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/my_pubs/anarchism.html), Professor Moglen suggested that in an environment where marginal cost is equal to zero, "anarchism (or more properly, anti-possessive individualism) is a viable political philosophy" (The Legal Theory of Free Software).
>
>		In his Article "Software as Property: The Theoretical Paradox", Professor Moglen suggested that in an environment where marginal cost is equal to zero, "anarchism (or more properly, anti-possessive individualism) is a viable political philosophy" (The Legal Theory of Free Software).
 In the realm of software, Moglen’s facts instruct us that anarchism produces better software than any of our pre-existing propertarian modes. Distribution, it goes without saying, is also inherently bolstered in this regime. With regards to goods that are non-functional and impossible to evaluate by a single set of criteria (herein referred to as “non-evaluable goods”), such as music, art, prose and poetry, Moglen explains, anarchy will deliver superior distribution.

Revision 4r4 - 11 Oct 2014 - 18:05:19 - UriHacohen
Revision 3r3 - 10 Oct 2014 - 02:32:15 - UriHacohen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM