Southcote's Case

Why is Southcote's Case, 4 Co. Rep. 83b; Cro. Eliz. 815 (1601)? The rule never appealed to anyone before or since, as no one has ever tried to disturb Coggs v. Bernard, which overruled it, and where Holt said that the judges in London had never followed it. How did it come to be decided ... or was it decided?

(I'd like to take this. --LuisVilla)

Navigation

EngLegalHist EngLegalHist

New Topic
Index
Changes
Notifications
Statistics

Webs Webs

Main
AmLegalHist
CompPrivConst
EngLegalHist
LawContempSoc
LawNetSoc
TWiki

r2 - 21 Oct 2008 - 19:16:25 - LuisVilla

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.

Syndicate this site RSS ATOM

Southcote's Case

Navigation

EngLegalHist TWiki.TwistyPlugin.init("twistyIdEngLegalHistWebSideBar1show");EngLegalHist TWiki.TwistyPlugin.init("twistyIdEngLegalHistWebSideBar1hide");

Webs TWiki.TwistyPlugin.init("twistyIdTWikiFlexWebListNavi2show");Webs TWiki.TwistyPlugin.init("twistyIdTWikiFlexWebListNavi2hide");

EngLegalHist EngLegalHist

Webs Webs