I just read an article in the Times (linked below) that explores the impact of the economy on the billable hour. Much of it tells us what we already know. Mainly, law firms (and their clients) are facing difficult times in the midst of the economic downtown. It goes on to suggest that more firms are considering alternative billing plans (flat rates, smaller fees, etc…). The article caused me to question two things; the first is whether change is really near and the second involves the extent to which law school has trained me to be conscious of my time.

1. Talk is cheap; the billable hour is not

The article initially won my attention because it was listed as one of the most-emailed business stories. It’s funny because in some ways, it is a tired topic. How many times has the need for the elimination of the billable hour been discussed? (hint: a lot, scroll through the wiki posts/papers from last year and you’ll have your evidence). I am a skeptic at heart, but after reading it, I am curious as to whether the state of economy will be the tipping point that causes big firms to actually change their ways.

2. It just took me 23 minutes to write this

I am now being trained in the billable hour mindset. It is a little disturbing to think that I am conscious of my time in a way that I have never been before. Please tell me I am not alone in this. Since Legal Methods, how many of us have found ourselves calculating how long it takes us to read 10 pages of an assignment or carefully outlining how much time we have wasted on Law and Order or G-chat? How conscious are we of every minute a professor lectures over time? Many say attorneys are uptight, boring and often distressed; are we honing these characteristics now?

What do you think? Is the dynasty crumbling for real this time? Is being overly-conscious of one’s time and value a good thing? Is a partner really "worth" 800 dollars an hour???

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/business/30hours.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&em

-- UchechiAmadi - 30 Jan 2009