BrianMaidaSecondEssay 2 - 05 Jun 2016 - Main.EbenMoglen
|
|
META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
| |
< < | | | | |
< < | It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted. | | Academia Bulimia | | Carl Wylie has given me a mission: I need to find something, with long-term viability, that interests me, because I don’t want to end up like Carl Wylie. But if it doesn’t work out, at least I love espresso. | |
> > | The bulimia metaphor is
unnecessary. It adds nothing analytically and consumes space. You
are a gifted learner, but you have wasted the gift in a fashion that
has become habitual, imposed not by external resource constraints
but by temperament failures. They have reduced your productivity by
an order of magnitude. You invent reasons why this is okay. One of
them is that you're just like your sister, which either is true or
isn't, but in either event is not even a small shit's worth of an
argument. You are correct that if you turn this self-limiting habit
into a way of life, as Wylie has, you will eventually become
unhealthily distressed. But the essay draft before us is not about
recognizing and dealing with that. It's intellectually lazy, again,
satisfied to have characterized the problem without actually
determining the failing component.
You are blaming the tools, which is not the position of the good
mechanic. Your first essay is an attempt to show that when it comes
to judging, experience and long dedication are bad things,
ostensibly because they belong to the old. Your second is an
introspective effort to explain how an attachment failure in your
relation to work has severely limited the productivity of a superbly
gifted young learner. The relation between the two efforts is
clear, I think. You are trying to make the right turn. You need to
deal, constructively, with the parts of yourself that actually get
in your way.
| |
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines: |
|
BrianMaidaSecondEssay 1 - 01 Apr 2016 - Main.BrianMaida
|
|
> > |
META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
Academia Bulimia
-- By BrianMaida - 01 Apr 2016
My Disorder
The Mayo Clinic defines bulimia nervosa as an emotional eating disorder; effected persons binge, eating large amounts of food, and subsequently purge, trying to get rid of extra calories in an unhealthy way.
Since graduation from college, my friends have spread across the country achieving more and more impressive feats: George took a job at SpaceX? , Matias got promoted at General Motors, Charlie is one of the lead engineers supervising Columbia’s new building project on 125th Street. Meanwhile, I sit in the Arthur W. Diamond Library of Jerome Greene Hall and read. Torts, contracts, property, crim, it’s all a blur. Every few months the four of us get together at McSorley? ’s, our old stomping ground, right across the street from our alma mater. The night plays out the same each time: we drink, quickly update each other on new developments and then we reminisce. Without fail, the story gets told of my finest and worst cramming moment. I slept through my alarm and showed up at 8:15AM for a 9AM Quantum Physics final, without even knowing what topics I was about to be tested on. The three of them sat with me for a few minutes and showed me the “important stuff.” I was a nervous, emotional wreck... so I ate a large amount of physics, and subsequently purged it into a bluebook, trying to get my A in an unhealthy way.
My Sister
My sister Lauren is a patent lawyer at a boutique firm in New York, having moved on from Cravath to work [slightly] fewer hours, for similar pay, with the added bonus of actually seeing her son. Lauren and I have a lot in common: same NYC public schools, majored in engineering at the same college, worked for four years and then attended law school. She likes to joke that she worked her ass of to blaze a trail in life and I just followed her.
When Lauren would come over the house and talk about work, it seemed like she was constantly switching careers. At one dinner she gave me an in-depth explanation about the process for making steel; the next month it was a banking app; following that, she was a coffee connoisseur. Seemingly every few months, Lauren would have to learn some aspect of a completely new field, apply it to the case, and potentially never use it again. I mean, she doesn’t even drink coffee.
While she would certainly dispute this, in my opinion, my sister is a professional crammer.
My Concern
Thus far in my life, I can say, somewhat depressingly, that I crammed successfully for every exam in my academic career, with the exception of the LSAT (I tried and failed; those LSAC writers know what they’re doing). Up until recently, I thought this was a good thing. But since I met Carl Wylie, I find myself asking...
Is cramming really a good thing?
Cramming requires the ability to absorb information very quickly and then apply it. Cramming is a skill and I would argue, vehemently, a valuable skill. For starters, in today’s education-focused society, being a good crammer can ensure that you won’t end up like Richard Parker. But cramming is a double-edged sword because it is accompanied, inevitably, by the added consequence of retaining, in my unscientific, untested opinion, well less than 50% of the material. There are situations in the context of being a law student, which have nothing to do with exams, where this double-edged sword can feel like Excalibur. Over winter break, I went to interview with a judge for a summer internship. However, the interview was on very short notice, and I needed to be at least conversational regarding his recent opinions. So, on the 1-train, I did a WestLaw? search for his recent opinions and regurgitated them during the interview. Do I remember them now? I think one of them was about personal jurisdiction. A month after? A week after? An hour after? Nope. But I believe this was a perfectly appropriate cram; I’ll never need to discuss his opinions again. The same goes for torts. If the real world really does require me to know the difference between an invitee and a licensee, I’ll look it up.
My Wily Mission
But recently, I met Carl Wylie.
“Twenty-seven years—trillions of details! You ask me a month from now what the deal I’ve just done was about, I won’t be able to tell you. Don’t think it doesn’t make me stop and wonder what its done to my brain, either.”
By some outward measures, Carl Wylie is a success; after all, he is a hard-working partner at a law firm. At the same time, it would be difficult for me to believe that any one would want to be Carl Wylie; he’s a mildly manic-depressant, schizophrenic lawyer that “really don’t care” what the law is. However, he did make me reflect on my life.
About a year ago, I realized that my once great memory was eroding. At least a dozen times since I have started law school, I met someone and then saw them at a later date and began the conversation with “Nice to meet you, I’m Brian.” I’ve just altogether stopped telling people that it’s nice to meet them. Cramming isn’t learning. I have trained my brain to forget.
The only way I have noticed to counteract the forgetfulness is with a concerted effort typically sparked by an interest. If the person I meet is interesting, I don’t start the next conversation with “Nice to meet you.” Finals are six weeks away and the cramming needs to stop, but man... I really hate Property.
Carl Wylie has given me a mission: I need to find something, with long-term viability, that interests me, because I don’t want to end up like Carl Wylie. But if it doesn’t work out, at least I love espresso.
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list. |
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|