Working Title: The Fourth Estate

-- By AndreiVoinigescu

Table of Contents

Introduction

Is investigative journalism essential to our political system? Can investigative journalism be done outside traditional commercial newsgathering organizations? What will happen to investigative journalism as print newspaper become unprofitable? Is the copyright system essential to producing sustained works of effort like investigative journalism? In copyright law's current form? What about broadcasting monopolies? Are they essential? Can other actors step in to subsume the role of investigative journalism? Publicly sponsored? By government taxes? By charity? By patrons? What can be learned from the credit agencies' failure? Credit ratings are sometimes referred to as "the shortest editorial." Is investigative journalism a similarly flawed system?

The net has lowered the cost of collaboration. Has the net lowered the cost of investigative journalism?

Perhaps what is needed for investigative journalism isn't money -- it's the concentrated power of the media company behind the investigator? This leads to potential 'coupling' between media and those in power.

The credibility came from the name of the organization -- they engaged in 'reporting'. You trusted them. Pre-publishment screening vs post-publishment 'digg' style sorting.

The news media put people into power. Television was the most power-concentrating medium in the world because there was no answering television without your own license to broadcast.

Paragraph 1

Paragraph 2

Paragraph 3

Conclusion

-- (totally off-topic) Hypothesis: Value Formation is Reactionary: Values arise/gain prominence in a community as a direct response to previous conditions within that community that a majority of its members find intuitively unacceptable--in response to gut-wrenching injustice.

Thus, many new issues arise in value-neutral or value-sparse space, where existing values offer either little or no guidence on how to proceed.